activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Christopher Shannon <christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com>
Subject [CANCEL][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.13.3
Date Thu, 28 Apr 2016 11:42:07 GMT
Cancelling the vote based on the feedback from the test failure.

I'm going to go ahead and re-do the release with the corrected test.  I'll
start a new vote as soon as I am done today.

On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 6:24 PM, artnaseef <art@amlinv.com> wrote:

> OK, so here's my -1
>
> Once that fix is back-ported, please let me know and I'll run the 3.5 hours
> of tests again ;-).
>
> Otherwise, the build looks really good to me.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 4:05 AM, christopher.l.shannon [via ActiveMQ] <
> ml-node+s2283324n4711270h18@n4.nabble.com> wrote:
>
> > The test failure is not an issue because the test itself is the problem.
> > It is related to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-6175  Gary
> > fixed
> > the test in master but it wasn't backported to 5.13.x. (I'll do that now
> > in
> > case o a 5.13.4)
> >
> > We have been working gradually on fixing tests with hard coded ports (a
> > lot
> > have been fixed already) but not all of them have been fixed yet.  Some
> of
> > the network tests are more tricky to not rely on hard code ports.
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 5:12 PM, artnaseef <[hidden email]
> > <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4711270&i=0>> wrote:
> >
> > > I keep getting the following test failure on the build:
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> testSuppression(org.apache.activemq.broker.jmx.SelectiveMBeanRegistrationTest)
> >
> > > > Time elapsed: 30.616 sec  <<< FAILURE!
> > > > java.lang.AssertionError: one sub
> > > >         at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:88)
> > > >         at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:41)
> > > >         at
> > > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.activemq.broker.jmx.SelectiveMBeanRegistrationTest.testSuppression(SelectiveMBeanRegistrationTest.java:86)
> >
> > >
> > > Any thoughts?
> > >
> > > Note that I also had failures on another test because that test
> > hard-coded
> > > port numbers that were in-use on my system (that's
> > > RequestReplyToTopicViaThreeNetworkHopsTest).
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > View this message in context:
> > >
> >
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-ActiveMQ-5-13-3-tp4711217p4711242.html
> > > Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
> > below:
> >
> >
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-ActiveMQ-5-13-3-tp4711217p4711270.html
> > To start a new topic under ActiveMQ - Dev, email
> > ml-node+s2283324n2368404h72@n4.nabble.com
> > To unsubscribe from ActiveMQ - Dev, click here
> > <
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=2368404&code=YXJ0QGFtbGludi5jb218MjM2ODQwNHwyMDc3NjQwODU5
> >
> > .
> > NAML
> > <
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-ActiveMQ-5-13-3-tp4711217p4711298.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message