Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-activemq-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AA93018D64 for ; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 18:05:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 54345 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jan 2016 18:05:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-dev-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 54281 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jan 2016 18:05:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 54269 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jan 2016 18:05:23 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 18:05:23 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id AA4C1C0D24 for ; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 18:05:22 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.88 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.88 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, KAM_LIVE=1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-eu-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aWI37y0b54ww for ; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 18:05:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vk0-f50.google.com (mail-vk0-f50.google.com [209.85.213.50]) by mx1-eu-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-eu-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 9715420BFB for ; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 18:05:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vk0-f50.google.com with SMTP id e185so13631443vkb.1 for ; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 10:05:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=Z6wAQzy0mrNm2sz8je5cM/tGhqlkp0xL++yN2FpfPtU=; b=mTAcoPeRFdx+8CWrQXb75JDUv8ewGQBwBzrsCJX53QNN6FoCiO/lkFmxTvO3yp3vwn b8FQNd7TWC1HIMyKzEi7jbT7WNfFsDCSSUfgwU/+LlrX/V09XeUnRzrTwzhywVZhI1e5 +VHY/j4CpykbfhbHSQKLb85CvHYmICK6u/+3B9r12hai+YVT/1QLL+Z28vqlR2aL5bBD 4F9VPwS8DZz5kEHsjrIwLUWR63lEDBKITdIzWtawhTa26mweRWOLOfNeVxYBm7Vqh3YB 9mQRcz4wqfYd2ng4DwQZRkSrTriofvmc6hLUM5JbwP291RyURT1dDlKW+q6XLmL/zeZ8 izdQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Z6wAQzy0mrNm2sz8je5cM/tGhqlkp0xL++yN2FpfPtU=; b=eAjIodfP7mTn/M8Pap22XgN4kYzC7Hw6LSsMCa58Btxv18tCJCoQMRU0XREBAYls26 Q6cD8NRyK7b8+YNRigFwZgTu8Y4gZpYjWJ1hbCfVfXyQYadvxncqHUZ3RmF5RJCfiwwM OwvLvqQf/2Hr2d4GU+IMER7hjXu35om/JlvqqoiMee19yTKn6m/NeoSQcuEiI7GNF3wQ 3KO5OvRgu/IZZ8AgLzddHtWENV1QlF/Tj9UZZJVv1hi5rKsP9vOO0PTYs94OLuBMCSgK 0Brp9y5lU9NvKNboWQ7DBVIFt2w/ROhdm+k4jrPHLV4/f3L4PiP+ODKKEUmkCksHNIU+ aahA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkPSp+KW1kg9bA5xLwE7J3wIKumYD6LEZJL3SMwb3sL3wUeDHO/TAAhD2Ax1BQEpMDBauqqWOP0fw5YhcOmIUWOoEewuQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.31.58.74 with SMTP id h71mr21725428vka.149.1453226715674; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 10:05:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.31.87.134 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 10:05:15 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <569D0A6D.9000100@gmail.com> References: <569D0A6D.9000100@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 13:05:15 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Purge ActiveMQ Snapshots Repo to get rid of old cruft From: Clebert Suconic To: "dev@activemq.apache.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 +1 On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Timothy Bish wrote: > We seem to have a bit of a mess in our snapshots area with lots of old > snapshots for ancient releases like 5.3, 5.4, etc along with snapshots > for an ActiveMQ 6.0.0 release that has caused some confusion recently. > > Some examples of old snapshots or snapshot to things that were never > released. > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/activemq/activemq-aerogear-integration/ > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/activemq/activemq-all/ > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/activemq/activemq-book/ > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/activemq/activemq-bootstrap/ > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/activemq/activemq-core-client/ > > We can request that infra wipe out the snapshots area and let the > jenkins runs repopulate with only the current builds for active project > work. Alternatively we can go through every folder and audit them but > given they are snapshots it's simpler just to blow them all away. > > Thoughts? > > -- > Tim Bish > twitter: @tabish121 > blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/ > > -- Clebert Suconic