activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Purge ActiveMQ Snapshots Repo to get rid of old cruft
Date Wed, 20 Jan 2016 14:44:04 GMT
We can do the same on Artemis....

So it will be better to make the changes before cleaning up the repo then.

On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 7:26 AM, Christopher Shannon
<christopher.l.shannon@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 for the version change...I've always used X.X.0-SNAPSHOT and not
> X.X-SNAPSHOT for development versions so this makes sense to me.
>
> I can change the current 5.14-SNAPSHOT to 5.14.0-SNAPSHOT if no one has any
> complaints.
>
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 4:39 PM, Timothy Bish <tabish121@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 01/19/2016 04:34 PM, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
>> > On 18 January 2016 at 18:46, Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemmell@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> On 18 January 2016 at 15:53, Timothy Bish <tabish121@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> We seem to have a bit of a mess in our snapshots area with lots of old
>> >>> snapshots for ancient releases like 5.3, 5.4, etc along with snapshots
>> >>> for an ActiveMQ 6.0.0 release that has caused some confusion recently.
>> >>>
>> >>> Some examples of old snapshots or snapshot to things that were never
>> >>> released.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/activemq/activemq-aerogear-integration/
>> >>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/activemq/activemq-all/
>> >>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/activemq/activemq-book/
>> >>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/activemq/activemq-bootstrap/
>> >>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/activemq/activemq-core-client/
>> >>>
>> >>> We can request that infra wipe out the snapshots area and let the
>> >>> jenkins runs repopulate with only the current builds for active project
>> >>> work.  Alternatively we can go through every folder and audit them but
>> >>> given they are snapshots it's simpler just to blow them all away.
>> >>>
>> >>> Thoughts?
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> Tim Bish
>> >>> twitter: @tabish121
>> >>> blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >> Cleaning things up would definitely be good. Given the sizable amount
>> >> of cruft I dont think it makes sense to try pruning them individually,
>> >> and I'm not sure infra would be particularly happy at being asked that
>> >> either hehe, so the full wipe seems like the way to go to me.
>> >>
>> >> Robbie
>> >
>> > To add to that...
>> >
>> > Old snapshots normally get cleaned up once a release occurs but this
>> > isn't happening for the ActiveMQ 5.X bits, which is why all those old
>> > bits are still there. The reason is likely that the snapshot versions
>> > dont align with the end release version used, as the snapshots are
>> > using 5.X-SNAPSHOT but the released bits then actually use 5.X.0, and
>> > so the cleanup process isn't able to recognise that the snapshots have
>> > become stale artifacts following a release.
>> >
>> > We should probably also change to using 5.X.0-SNAPSHOT on master
>> > (before asking infra to nuke the snapshot repo) to prevent more cruft
>> > accumulating again with each future release.
>> >
>> > Robbie
>> >
>> Exactly.  Hadn't gotten around to typing that up yet, thanks for saving
>> me some work Robbie :)
>>
>> --
>> Tim Bish
>> twitter: @tabish121
>> blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
>>
>>



-- 
Clebert Suconic

Mime
View raw message