activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Christopher Shannon <christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Purge ActiveMQ Snapshots Repo to get rid of old cruft
Date Wed, 20 Jan 2016 12:26:50 GMT
+1 for the version change...I've always used X.X.0-SNAPSHOT and not
X.X-SNAPSHOT for development versions so this makes sense to me.

I can change the current 5.14-SNAPSHOT to 5.14.0-SNAPSHOT if no one has any
complaints.

On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 4:39 PM, Timothy Bish <tabish121@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 01/19/2016 04:34 PM, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
> > On 18 January 2016 at 18:46, Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemmell@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> On 18 January 2016 at 15:53, Timothy Bish <tabish121@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> We seem to have a bit of a mess in our snapshots area with lots of old
> >>> snapshots for ancient releases like 5.3, 5.4, etc along with snapshots
> >>> for an ActiveMQ 6.0.0 release that has caused some confusion recently.
> >>>
> >>> Some examples of old snapshots or snapshot to things that were never
> >>> released.
> >>>
> >>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/activemq/activemq-aerogear-integration/
> >>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/activemq/activemq-all/
> >>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/activemq/activemq-book/
> >>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/activemq/activemq-bootstrap/
> >>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/activemq/activemq-core-client/
> >>>
> >>> We can request that infra wipe out the snapshots area and let the
> >>> jenkins runs repopulate with only the current builds for active project
> >>> work.  Alternatively we can go through every folder and audit them but
> >>> given they are snapshots it's simpler just to blow them all away.
> >>>
> >>> Thoughts?
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Tim Bish
> >>> twitter: @tabish121
> >>> blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
> >>>
> >>>
> >> Cleaning things up would definitely be good. Given the sizable amount
> >> of cruft I dont think it makes sense to try pruning them individually,
> >> and I'm not sure infra would be particularly happy at being asked that
> >> either hehe, so the full wipe seems like the way to go to me.
> >>
> >> Robbie
> >
> > To add to that...
> >
> > Old snapshots normally get cleaned up once a release occurs but this
> > isn't happening for the ActiveMQ 5.X bits, which is why all those old
> > bits are still there. The reason is likely that the snapshot versions
> > dont align with the end release version used, as the snapshots are
> > using 5.X-SNAPSHOT but the released bits then actually use 5.X.0, and
> > so the cleanup process isn't able to recognise that the snapshots have
> > become stale artifacts following a release.
> >
> > We should probably also change to using 5.X.0-SNAPSHOT on master
> > (before asking infra to nuke the snapshot repo) to prevent more cruft
> > accumulating again with each future release.
> >
> > Robbie
> >
> Exactly.  Hadn't gotten around to typing that up yet, thanks for saving
> me some work Robbie :)
>
> --
> Tim Bish
> twitter: @tabish121
> blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message