Mailing-List: contact dev-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@activemq.apache.org
From: Quinn Stevenson <quinn@pronoia-solutions.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="Apple-Mail=_666633B8-EDA1-4357-8FD0-C6B9829BB0D2"
Message-Id: <BA4F9F2D-F5BB-4DD7-B086-25B8226AAA60@pronoia-solutions.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\))
Subject: Re: JUnit Rule for Embedded Brokers
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 08:11:33 -0700
References: <2760A9D8-33A1-416F-9F21-88D91BD3973C@pronoia-solutions.com>
 <CAKF+bsr3znfjJLCzO9FakwizyhVN+WP6idrMeP=gcUDath8=Qg@mail.gmail.com>
 <9E607A0E-C032-4EAB-93A8-EFA13B519319@pronoia-solutions.com>
 <CAKF+bsrJAoL78Q3+yophcmKivQUx6Qu8om5O-8ry61kJBw6kdg@mail.gmail.com>
 <701940BF-CB8F-43AC-B12A-C1AE4DB1E43E@pronoia-solutions.com>
 <CACHnxzzqjFQQVdp_yasCPPOyaVzXciNF1wD-bwF=WWqSwqU-_Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <D7FF03C6-E52F-480A-AB7B-DE07031001AC@gmail.com>
To: dev@activemq.apache.org
In-Reply-To: <D7FF03C6-E52F-480A-AB7B-DE07031001AC@gmail.com>

--Apple-Mail=_666633B8-EDA1-4357-8FD0-C6B9829BB0D2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=utf-8

I created a JIRA AMQ-6106 - JUnit Rule for embedded ActiveMQ Broker and =
pull request  https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/163 =
<https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/163> for this a few days ago, =
but I haven=E2=80=99t heard anything back on whether or not this JUnit =
rule is something of interest to the community. =20

How long should I wait before closing the PR?

Quinn Stevenson
quinn@pronoia-solutions.com
(801) 244-7758


> On Dec 22, 2015, at 1:47 PM, Clebert Suconic =
<clebert.suconic@gmail.com> wrote:
>=20
> If u want to bootstrap a tooling project Its fine with git access etc. =
=20
>=20
> But maybe it would be easier as a folder in one of the projects.=20
>=20
>=20
> Sent from my iPhone
>=20
>> On Dec 22, 2015, at 3:14 PM, Christopher Shannon =
<christopher.l.shannon@gmail.com> wrote:
>>=20
>> It may need to go into a new subproject (as you pointed out, maybe =
under
>> tooling).  While it could also just go into the activemqunit-l
>> project, there are unit tests in almost every sub project and it =
would be
>> nice if the JUnit Rule could be used in any of these projects.  So, =
we'd
>> probably need to put it into a new tooling sub project and create a =
test
>> dependency for it.
>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Quinn Stevenson <
>> quinn@pronoia-solutions.com> wrote:
>>=20
>>> Thank You for the information.  I found the subproject on the =
ActiveMQ
>>> site, and I will be sure to get familiar with this.
>>>=20
>>> Since my needs are around JMS, I=E2=80=99ll work on a JUnit Rule for =
the Artemis
>>> EmbeddedJMS.
>>>=20
>>> Any suggestions on where to put the JUnit Rule for ActiveMQ 5.x in =
the
>>> source tree?
>>>=20
>>>>> On Dec 22, 2015, at 12:40 PM, Clebert Suconic =
<clebert.suconic@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>=20
>>>> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Quinn Stevenson
>>>> <quinn@pronoia-solutions.com> wrote:
>>>>> Please forgive my ignorance here - but is Artemis the next major
>>> version of ActiveMQ?  Or is it something else?
>>>>=20
>>>> I would prefer to say It's a sub project of ActiveMQ. A different
>>>> broker. We have been doing quite a lot of new development there.
>>>> If you look at the history it was a donation of hornetq to apache =
as a
>>>> sub project of activemq.
>>>=20
>>>=20


--Apple-Mail=_666633B8-EDA1-4357-8FD0-C6B9829BB0D2--