Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-activemq-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 660C618F65 for ; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 17:44:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 64547 invoked by uid 500); 21 Dec 2015 17:44:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-dev-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 64487 invoked by uid 500); 21 Dec 2015 17:44:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 64476 invoked by uid 99); 21 Dec 2015 17:44:08 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 17:44:08 +0000 Received: from server.dankulp.com (cn1.dankulp.com [64.85.173.253]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id B0D701A0361 for ; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 17:44:08 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\)) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Artemis 1.2.0 From: Daniel Kulp In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 12:44:04 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <68E4C713-D621-424F-B4CA-F21509F4A997@apache.org> References: <5674440F.7040805@redhat.com> To: dev@activemq.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3112) > On Dec 21, 2015, at 12:27 PM, John D. Ament = wrote: >=20 > On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 12:16 PM Clebert Suconic = > wrote: >=20 >> This has been like this since 1.0.0 >>=20 >>=20 > Then I missed them in prior votes. Mea culpa. We all missed them on the prior releases. =20 >>=20 >> I don't want to require users to install cmake and make just to >> compile this small library. it should be an optional step for those >> who want to do it. >>=20 >=20 > Nothing's stopping you from including them in the binary release. = They > should be excluded in the source release. Actually, this is more serious than that. If I=E2=80=99m reading = correctly, libaio is LGPL. Thus, we cannot use it from an Apache = release unless its: 1) completely optional - Artemis would have to =E2=80=9Cfunctionally = work=E2=80=9D without it 2) Not be part of the default build - in our case, we=E2=80=99d need a = maven profile to build it and that profile would need to not be = activeByDefault. Thus, I think this release cannot be released as is.=20 --=20 Daniel Kulp dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com