activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Quinn Stevenson <qu...@pronoia-solutions.com>
Subject Re: JUnit Rule for Embedded Brokers
Date Thu, 31 Dec 2015 15:11:33 GMT
I created a JIRA AMQ-6106 - JUnit Rule for embedded ActiveMQ Broker and pull request  https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/163
<https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/163> for this a few days ago, but I haven’t
heard anything back on whether or not this JUnit rule is something of interest to the community.
 

How long should I wait before closing the PR?

Quinn Stevenson
quinn@pronoia-solutions.com
(801) 244-7758



> On Dec 22, 2015, at 1:47 PM, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suconic@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> If u want to bootstrap a tooling project Its fine with git access etc.  
> 
> But maybe it would be easier as a folder in one of the projects. 
> 
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On Dec 22, 2015, at 3:14 PM, Christopher Shannon <christopher.l.shannon@gmail.com>
wrote:
>> 
>> It may need to go into a new subproject (as you pointed out, maybe under
>> tooling).  While it could also just go into the activemqunit-l
>> project, there are unit tests in almost every sub project and it would be
>> nice if the JUnit Rule could be used in any of these projects.  So, we'd
>> probably need to put it into a new tooling sub project and create a test
>> dependency for it.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Quinn Stevenson <
>> quinn@pronoia-solutions.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Thank You for the information.  I found the subproject on the ActiveMQ
>>> site, and I will be sure to get familiar with this.
>>> 
>>> Since my needs are around JMS, I’ll work on a JUnit Rule for the Artemis
>>> EmbeddedJMS.
>>> 
>>> Any suggestions on where to put the JUnit Rule for ActiveMQ 5.x in the
>>> source tree?
>>> 
>>>>> On Dec 22, 2015, at 12:40 PM, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suconic@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Quinn Stevenson
>>>> <quinn@pronoia-solutions.com> wrote:
>>>>> Please forgive my ignorance here - but is Artemis the next major
>>> version of ActiveMQ?  Or is it something else?
>>>> 
>>>> I would prefer to say It's a sub project of ActiveMQ. A different
>>>> broker. We have been doing quite a lot of new development there.
>>>> If you look at the history it was a donation of hornetq to apache as a
>>>> sub project of activemq.
>>> 
>>> 


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message