activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS IDEA] artemis create --docker
Date Thu, 01 Oct 2015 13:00:39 GMT
These are the options that can be part of a create:

https://gist.github.com/clebertsuconic/a4a7c02e3b71961ca181

On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 8:58 AM, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suconic@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I'm afraid I kind of disagree with you in believeing there is value on
>
>> the artemis
>> create phase. There is very little  customization at that point and very
>> little to no value at all would be added by generating a docker image at
>> this phase, i.e: Why not just have an official docker image published in
>> dockerhub that would have the very same effect with much less tooling and
>> non standard procedures involved?
>>
>>
>
> Actually you got that part wrong... There's a lot of customizations being
> done as part of ./artemis create...
>
> For example, clustered, non clustered, HTTP PORT, ports, what users,
> security... and we can even add more options to it.
>
> So, adding a --docker would allow users to create a very customized
> version of a docker instance. And the maven plugins we created as part of
> the examples on 1.1.0 would get all the benefit of such a new feature.
>
>
>> *What about creating an image of an already customized instance?*
>>
>>
> you could have a lot of customizations..
>
>>
>> Personally I would create one or two images, the one I already created and
>> potentially another one customized for clustering.
>>
>>
> I don't think it would be just one or two
>



-- 
Clebert Suconic

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message