activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Christopher Shannon <christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: 5.11.2....
Date Mon, 03 Aug 2015 19:50:54 GMT
A couple of other bug candidates I thing would be good to include if not
already on the branch:

AMQ-5674: 20832f1f1b5bf028d43256a8b2172f2795b0c02d
AMQ-5742: c85fa67e1c65caecb96d3a044fbd5ac835cce3db
AMQ-5787 : e99c8148301c6ff6b6ed529a26ba3337ef20d016
AMQ-5813: ea03bb1f8cb2bce97fabdaa8fa287f4c9f977a3a
AMQ-5814 : e4af2eb63501251befc33a415abfad2b72d53321



On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org> wrote:

>
> > On Jul 30, 2015, at 11:06 AM, Christopher Shannon <
> christopher.l.shannon@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I checked Jira and there are over 100 bug issues against 5.12.0 that have
> > been resolved.  I'm thinking that going forward it might make sense to
> > backport fixes when the tickets are resolved if it makes sense to do so.
>
> I’d love to see that, but most of the people that have implemented fixes
> don’t seem to want to spend the time pulling them back to any of the fixes
> branches.   :(    As long as the people doing the fixes aren’t willing to
> do it, it becomes really tough as it’s more about asking other folks to
> take a look.   That’s something even non-committers could do and help out
> with.   In this case, I specifically asked for any fixes or git hashes or
> something to pull back and got exactly one.  Not a good sign.
>
> > This won't work for all cases but it would cut down the work at release
> > time if some of the commits can be merged ahead of time.
>
> In any case, I do plan on doing the build on Wednesday or  Thursday.  If
> anyone would like something pulled back, please let me know.
>
> Thanks!
> Dan
>
>
>
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>> On Jul 30, 2015, at 10:44 AM, Paul Gale <paul.n.gale@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> If possible can AMQ-5903 be included in 5.11.2? It's only on master at
> >> the
> >>> moment, e.g. destined for 5.12.0.
> >>
> >> Done… can you verify it’s on the branch properly and working?
> >>
> >> Dan
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Paul
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> It’s been a while since 5.11.1 so I’d like to get a 5.11.2 release
out
> >>>> shortly, probably early/mid next week.    There’s not a lot of fixes
> on
> >> the
> >>>> branch right now, just stuff mostly necessary for OSGi to support
> >> running
> >>>> ActiveMQ in Karaf4.
> >>>>
> >>>> If there are other fixes that people would like to get in, please get
> >> them
> >>>> cherry-picked to the activemq-5.11.x branch or send me the git hashes
> >> and I
> >>>> can take a look and get them merged.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks!
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Daniel Kulp
> >>>> dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
> >>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Daniel Kulp
> >> dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
> >> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
> >>
> >>
>
> --
> Daniel Kulp
> dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message