activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andy Taylor <andy.tayl...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [HEADS-UP/Discussion] Artemis: Planning a release soon
Date Thu, 13 Aug 2015 17:44:50 GMT
Just to add, I think from 1.1 we do it the way suggested i.e  minor
versions for patch releases etc but until Artemis can be regarded  as a
possible alternative to activemq I think stick to 1.0.1, having lots of
major versions will just confuse people imo

On Thu, 13 Aug 2015 18:03 Andy Taylor <andy.tayls67@gmail.com> wrote:

> I have to disagree. We haven't really done a real major release. This
> first one was for ip clearance and we will be adding new functionality in
> every release and we don't want to end up at 1.20 before we know it. To me
> 1.1 will be the first release where we have some sort of feature parity
> with activemq.
>
> On Thu, 13 Aug 2015 16:49 Clebert Suconic <clebert.suconic@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> ok, we will do 1.1.0 (You convinced me.. through twitter actually ;) )...
>>
>> thinking again 1.0.1 makes it looks too minor... and there is a lot of
>> work done on artemis for this release, thanks for all the
>> contributions... It's really nice seeing great contributions here...
>> thanks everybody. (I can't name them all)
>>
>>
>> I would like to be the release manager for this release, but I won't
>> be around next week, otherwise I would start the process sooner, so i
>> will do it in 2 weeks possibly as a heads up.
>>
>>
>> Meanwhile, it would be nice people trying out and give us feedback on
>> two things from master: *
>> - try out MQTT. There's a small example under ./examples/protocols/mqtt
>> - look at our improved examples under ./examples (on both distro and
>> source)
>>
>>
>> * {
>> # how to build master:
>> git clone https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis.git artemis
>> cd artemis
>> mvn install
>> cd
>> artemis-distribution/target/apache-artemis-1.0.1-SNAPSHOT-bin/apache-artemis-1.0.1-SNAPSHOT/
>>
>> # ^^ That is the distribution.
>> }
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 3:53 AM, Claus Ibsen <claus.ibsen@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > I think 1.1.0 is better.
>> >
>> > Maybe here in the start where more new functions is added / ported
>> > from AMQ 5.x then the upcoming releases are IMHO more fitted as new
>> > minor releases, than patch releases.
>> >
>> > And then when Artemis has a great set of features in 1.x, then
>> > dedicated patch releases could be done which are more careful selected
>> > bug fixes etc.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 2:04 AM, Clebert Suconic
>> > <clebert.suconic@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> I believe we should be ready for a release the end of this week, early
>> >> next week.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> I was going to call it 1.0.1 since my original plan was to keep
>> >> calilng these 1.0.1, 1.0.2, ... 1.0.n until the JIRAs on the release
>> >> 1.1.0 were fixed.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> however since the addition of the first MQTT protocol, that makes it a
>> >> new / major feature.  I'm not sure we should call it 1.0.1 or 1.1.0
>> >> now.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> We have also fixed logs of bugs.. and I'm currently doing some work on
>> >> examples (adding an openwire example and doing some work on open wire)
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> There are a lot of fixes around openwire as well.
>> >>
>> >> Any ideas on the release name?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Claus Ibsen
>> > -----------------
>> > http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus
>> > Camel in Action 2nd edition: http://www.manning.com/ibsen2
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Clebert Suconic
>>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message