activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>
Subject Re: 5.11.2....
Date Wed, 05 Aug 2015 13:28:43 GMT
Thanks for this list.  I’ve pulled these back (along with a couple others needed to get these
to compile).   The tests all pass.

I’ll likely do the 5.11.2 builds tomorrow morning.  If anyone has anything else they need,
let me know ASAP!

Thanks!
Dan



> On Aug 3, 2015, at 3:50 PM, Christopher Shannon <christopher.l.shannon@gmail.com>
wrote:
> 
> A couple of other bug candidates I thing would be good to include if not
> already on the branch:
> 
> AMQ-5674: 20832f1f1b5bf028d43256a8b2172f2795b0c02d
> AMQ-5742: c85fa67e1c65caecb96d3a044fbd5ac835cce3db
> AMQ-5787 : e99c8148301c6ff6b6ed529a26ba3337ef20d016
> AMQ-5813: ea03bb1f8cb2bce97fabdaa8fa287f4c9f977a3a
> AMQ-5814 : e4af2eb63501251befc33a415abfad2b72d53321
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org> wrote:
> 
>> 
>>> On Jul 30, 2015, at 11:06 AM, Christopher Shannon <
>> christopher.l.shannon@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I checked Jira and there are over 100 bug issues against 5.12.0 that have
>>> been resolved.  I'm thinking that going forward it might make sense to
>>> backport fixes when the tickets are resolved if it makes sense to do so.
>> 
>> I’d love to see that, but most of the people that have implemented fixes
>> don’t seem to want to spend the time pulling them back to any of the fixes
>> branches.   :(    As long as the people doing the fixes aren’t willing to
>> do it, it becomes really tough as it’s more about asking other folks to
>> take a look.   That’s something even non-committers could do and help out
>> with.   In this case, I specifically asked for any fixes or git hashes or
>> something to pull back and got exactly one.  Not a good sign.
>> 
>>> This won't work for all cases but it would cut down the work at release
>>> time if some of the commits can be merged ahead of time.
>> 
>> In any case, I do plan on doing the build on Wednesday or  Thursday.  If
>> anyone would like something pulled back, please let me know.
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> Dan
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On Jul 30, 2015, at 10:44 AM, Paul Gale <paul.n.gale@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> If possible can AMQ-5903 be included in 5.11.2? It's only on master at
>>>> the
>>>>> moment, e.g. destined for 5.12.0.
>>>> 
>>>> Done… can you verify it’s on the branch properly and working?
>>>> 
>>>> Dan
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Paul
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org>
wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> It’s been a while since 5.11.1 so I’d like to get a 5.11.2 release
out
>>>>>> shortly, probably early/mid next week.    There’s not a lot of
fixes
>> on
>>>> the
>>>>>> branch right now, just stuff mostly necessary for OSGi to support
>>>> running
>>>>>> ActiveMQ in Karaf4.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> If there are other fixes that people would like to get in, please
get
>>>> them
>>>>>> cherry-picked to the activemq-5.11.x branch or send me the git hashes
>>>> and I
>>>>>> can take a look and get them merged.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Daniel Kulp
>>>>>> dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
>>>>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Daniel Kulp
>>>> dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
>>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>>>> 
>>>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Daniel Kulp
>> dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>> 
>> 

-- 
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com


Mime
View raw message