Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-activemq-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3F12D18011 for ; Tue, 9 Jun 2015 14:36:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 65606 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2015 14:36:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-dev-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 65563 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2015 14:36:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 65547 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2015 14:36:38 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Jun 2015 14:36:38 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 3E04D182224 for ; Tue, 9 Jun 2015 14:36:38 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.129 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.129 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-us-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7VgRzh2kYQ-E for ; Tue, 9 Jun 2015 14:36:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f169.google.com (mail-wi0-f169.google.com [209.85.212.169]) by mx1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 6F38C27621 for ; Tue, 9 Jun 2015 14:36:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wiga1 with SMTP id a1so19586545wig.0 for ; Tue, 09 Jun 2015 07:36:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=n2LQlOF2YEcSJZnWSOPWuNWA+QQ6UU8stvy/9blNt2k=; b=0/0f2qsN0F/vsbL9MoAHsg8jmaNiU0r5lsMLptb8HlzYzzPwvj9st+3VTwTLM8FxhR jPKnmMZQj6y2tvyit21l87pIMA3QPb27G6hApBWcOaSKIOAtZO9xuEfhX8Ig+46tthS+ e7VjyNjcxGppZLaXKJDNCPA7DUHCg0rPl6xLKsCr2A+S5ilquUs1+17+vLgY4a3J/7IC 2P38uCRk+tsHa0fS/nUnDxEE1YT+i9Hqkdm0YG8mJpdAoWZ6mdXUIPyW+hPH9cnizvzL QowL+1FPyMqtGm/zqZ+XU0FZjMjY4M95neoTw9e1gEhXHnjjxmJcdFUbluVo2ZJgOfGU jz8Q== X-Received: by 10.194.62.132 with SMTP id y4mr10519053wjr.91.1433860595225; Tue, 09 Jun 2015 07:36:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (97e10897.skybroadband.com. [151.225.8.151]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id q2sm9738350wjz.15.2015.06.09.07.36.33 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 09 Jun 2015 07:36:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5576F9F1.9070102@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2015 15:36:33 +0100 From: Andy Taylor User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: Git workflow for committers References: <1811551184.15128779.1433770531217.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <6DAB46EB-91E0-45AE-AA4D-DBC7D4466794@apache.org> <2079974312.15145151.1433771649474.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <5575C09E.3040000@gmail.com> <506E747B-88D3-4E65-97BB-DD05D9D8B62D@apache.org> <83FD022B-E8AC-47CC-83E4-25516EC24E02@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit If anyone doesnt want to use Github then they can simply use git to create a patch and send it to the dev list. Another committer can then review it, raise a PR, wait for the CI build to test it and then it can be merged in the usual way. This way we keep all the info we need and a consistent graph. On 09/06/15 15:32, Clebert Suconic wrote: >> It turns out we didn’t have a build setup for that. We do now. > > The build I sent you before was a PR build from my own PR. Unless you > set it up somewhere. Did you set up a new build for that? > > On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Clebert Suconic > wrote: >>> Well, I fixed that situation this morning. I *THOUGHT* we had a CI build that was running on master on all commits. That was the expectation and if something broke I would have gotten a “this is broken” email within 15 minutes or so. It turns out we didn’t have a build setup for that. We do now. >>> >> >> I was not being specific about the situation itself.. just finding it >> as an example on where the CI build would been useful. >> >> We have a CI build that run on every Pull Request, not on every commit. >> >> We have a daily build but they are not as fast on catching issues. >> >> >>>> I'm asking if you could at least send a PR and wait for the build to finish. >>> >>> How do I do a pull request that doesn’t involve github? I’m not using github for development. >>> >> >> You really need github for that. You would need a github account >> associated with your apache email and send send the PR. >> >> You don't want to use github at all? If you don't want to use github, >> then you certainly won't be able to use these tools. >> >> Do you have any issues on using github? > > >