activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bruce Snyder <bruce.sny...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache Artemis 1.0.0 (RC2)
Date Thu, 14 May 2015 16:14:37 GMT
+1 We debated this some time ago for ActiveMQ and opted for the current
functionality of allowing remote connections by default.

Bruce

On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Hiram Chirino <hiram@hiramchirino.com>
wrote:

> I'm not sure that's a good default.  ActiveMQ has traditionally
> allowed remote access to it's ports.  I think a localhost binding is
> fine for things like management ports, but for the main service the
> product gives it should be on the public ports.
>
> That would be like tomcat or jetty defaulting to binding it's http
> ports to localhost.
>
> On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Justin Bertram <jbertram@apache.com>
> wrote:
> > IMO the broker correctly binds to localhost only and does not, by
> default, allow connections from remote machines.  This is a simple
> security/sanity measure to prevent access to default (i.e. unsecured)
> instances.
> >
> > The merit of this configuration is obviously up for debate, but it's
> worth noting it was done on purpose.
> >
> >
> > Justin
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Jim Gomes" <e.semog@gmail.com>
> > To: "ActiveMQ Dev" <dev@activemq.apache.org>
> > Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2015 10:05:55 AM
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Artemis 1.0.0 (RC2)
> >
> > -1
> >
> > Two reasons:
> >
> > 1. The default configuration of localhost for the broker does not allow
> > connections from off-machine. For some reason, socket connections are
> > refused from non-local clients. I had to change the broker.xml config to
> > use the machine's actual IP address, and then non-local clients could
> > connect.
> > 2. The basic NMS OpenWire client fails to connect at all. It is getting
> > unknown response IDs from the broker. I don't think the OpenWire protocol
> > is being negotiated correctly. I am running with the latest NMS trunk
> > version (1.8.0).
> >
> >
> > On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Martyn Taylor <mtaylor@redhat.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hello all.
> >>
> >> I've cut a second release candidate of Apache Artemis 1.0.0 addressing
> the
> >> initial RC feedback from community members.
> >>
> >> This is a first release of the Artemis project with protocol support for
> >> AMQP, STOMP, CORE, HORNETQ and OPENWIRE.
> >>
> >> The release notes can be found here:
> >>
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315920&version=12328953
> >>
> >> The binary distributions can be found here:
> >>
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1051/org/apache/activemq/apache-artemis/1.0.0/
> >>
> >> The source archives can be found here:
> >>
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1051/org/apache/activemq/apache-artemis/1.0.0/
> >>
> >> The Maven repository is here:
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1051/
> >>
> >> The source tag:
> >>
> >>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq-artemis.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/1.0.0
> >>
> >> The project website for that version has been staged to:
> >> http://people.apache.org/~martyntaylor/
> >>
> >> The vote will remain open for 72 hours.
> >>
> >> [ ] +1 approve the release as Apache Artemis 1.0.0
> >> [ ] +0 no opinion
> >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >>
> >> Here's my (non-binding) +1
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> Martyn
> >>
>
>
>
> --
> Hiram Chirino
> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
> hchirino@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com
> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>



-- 
perl -e 'print
unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );'

ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
Blog: http://bruceblog.org/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message