activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSSION] Renaming github mirror
Date Fri, 22 May 2015 02:54:10 GMT
As Geofrey said on the infra JIRA:

" Just waiting on Github to do their daily scrape of git.apache.org"

On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Thiago Kronig <thiagokronig@gmail.com> wrote:
> 404: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/
>
>
> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 9:18 PM Clebert Suconic <clebert.suconic@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> too late :)
>>
>> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 7:53 PM, Robbie Gemmell
>> <robbie.gemmell@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Err, I'd maybe hold up until tomorrow and give other folks a chance to
>> > chime in, the below was only one persons opinion hehe.
>> >
>> > When I say 'now' vs 'later' I just meant the immediate term verus
>> > months from now. I dont think its that big a deal that it has to
>> > happen *right now* :)
>> >
>> > Robbie
>> >
>> > On 22 May 2015 at 00:30, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suconic@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> Ok, I won't even wait for other people's feedback... I will just go
>> >> ahead and ask them to do it. Better now than later.
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 7:03 PM, Robbie Gemmell
>> >> <robbie.gemmell@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> As the JIRA project has just been renamed today and no release has
>> >>> occurred yet, I think now would probably be the best time to ever
>> >>> recreate the mirror.
>> >>>
>> >>> I dont think the pull requests numbers beginning again is that big an
>> >>> issue. The comments are available on the dev list as you said, and
>> >>> also any JIRAs the PR referenced, plus the commits made will remain
>> >>> for inspection. There will obviously be some overlap with the old
>> >>> numbers, but I dont think that should be too confusing as the dates
>> >>> will make it fairly easy to tell whether it is a current reference or
>> >>> an old one, plus any JIRA references will further help distinguish
>> >>> them (given the old PR commits would refer to the old ACTIVEMQ6 JIRA
>> >>> key, rather than the new ARTEMIS key).
>> >>>
>> >>> One other issue to note is that I believe forks of the current GitHub
>> >>> mirror will be re-parented against one of the remaining fork, so
>> >>> people might need to recreate their forks against the main repo again.
>> >>> I dont see that as too big a deal either though, and again better done
>> >>> now than later.
>> >>>
>> >>> Robbie
>> >>>
>> >>> On 21 May 2015 at 22:42, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suconic@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>>> I need some help with the discussion I'm having at:
>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9543
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> If you go to the artemis github mirror, you will see: mirrored from
>> >>>> git://git.apache.org/activemq-6.git
>> >>>>
>> >>>> https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> It happens that per what I heard from Infra, the only way to do
that
>> >>>> would be to recreate the repo. Meaning the Pull Request IDs would
>> >>>> restart, meaning we would lost any previous discussions we had on
>> >>>> github.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Although I'm not sure that's really a big deal, since these
>> >>>> discussions are all backed up at the dev list (the dev list has
been
>> >>>> hearing the PR comments).
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> So, is there anyone against recreating the repo?
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I asked Infra to wait until tomorrow.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Clebert Suconic
>> >> http://community.jboss.org/people/clebert.suconic@jboss.com
>> >> http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Clebert Suconic
>> http://community.jboss.org/people/clebert.suconic@jboss.com
>> http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com
>>



-- 
Clebert Suconic
http://community.jboss.org/people/clebert.suconic@jboss.com
http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com

Mime
View raw message