activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSSION] Renaming github mirror
Date Fri, 22 May 2015 00:16:23 GMT
too late :)

On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 7:53 PM, Robbie Gemmell
<robbie.gemmell@gmail.com> wrote:
> Err, I'd maybe hold up until tomorrow and give other folks a chance to
> chime in, the below was only one persons opinion hehe.
>
> When I say 'now' vs 'later' I just meant the immediate term verus
> months from now. I dont think its that big a deal that it has to
> happen *right now* :)
>
> Robbie
>
> On 22 May 2015 at 00:30, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suconic@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Ok, I won't even wait for other people's feedback... I will just go
>> ahead and ask them to do it. Better now than later.
>>
>> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 7:03 PM, Robbie Gemmell
>> <robbie.gemmell@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> As the JIRA project has just been renamed today and no release has
>>> occurred yet, I think now would probably be the best time to ever
>>> recreate the mirror.
>>>
>>> I dont think the pull requests numbers beginning again is that big an
>>> issue. The comments are available on the dev list as you said, and
>>> also any JIRAs the PR referenced, plus the commits made will remain
>>> for inspection. There will obviously be some overlap with the old
>>> numbers, but I dont think that should be too confusing as the dates
>>> will make it fairly easy to tell whether it is a current reference or
>>> an old one, plus any JIRA references will further help distinguish
>>> them (given the old PR commits would refer to the old ACTIVEMQ6 JIRA
>>> key, rather than the new ARTEMIS key).
>>>
>>> One other issue to note is that I believe forks of the current GitHub
>>> mirror will be re-parented against one of the remaining fork, so
>>> people might need to recreate their forks against the main repo again.
>>> I dont see that as too big a deal either though, and again better done
>>> now than later.
>>>
>>> Robbie
>>>
>>> On 21 May 2015 at 22:42, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suconic@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> I need some help with the discussion I'm having at:
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9543
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If you go to the artemis github mirror, you will see: mirrored from
>>>> git://git.apache.org/activemq-6.git
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It happens that per what I heard from Infra, the only way to do that
>>>> would be to recreate the repo. Meaning the Pull Request IDs would
>>>> restart, meaning we would lost any previous discussions we had on
>>>> github.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Although I'm not sure that's really a big deal, since these
>>>> discussions are all backed up at the dev list (the dev list has been
>>>> hearing the PR comments).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So, is there anyone against recreating the repo?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I asked Infra to wait until tomorrow.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Clebert Suconic
>> http://community.jboss.org/people/clebert.suconic@jboss.com
>> http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com



-- 
Clebert Suconic
http://community.jboss.org/people/clebert.suconic@jboss.com
http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com

Mime
View raw message