activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSSION] Renaming github mirror
Date Fri, 22 May 2015 17:44:28 GMT
Infra (short for infra-structure)  is a team at apache that handles
things like JIRA, git integration... etc

On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Mark Frazier <mmfrazier@me.com> wrote:
> Robbie, I’m still rather new to Apache and the open source community, so I’m a little
confused.
>
> When you say “Infra”, what exactly are you referring to? Is this a part of the Apache
team?
>
> Thanks
>
>> On May 22, 2015, at 7:52 AM, Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemmell@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Infra have updated the 3 repos/mirrors so they now say ActiveMQ Artemis.
>>
>> Robbie
>>
>> On 22 May 2015 at 09:20, Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemmell@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> The GitHub mirror has been recreated, and now correctly says it is
>>> mirroring from the git://git.apache.org/activemq-artemis.git asf
>>> mirror.
>>>
>>> It does however still have a description that it is a "Mirror of
>>> Apache ActiveMQ 6". That is presumably because http://git.apache.org
>>> still shows a description of "Apache ActiveMQ 6" against its mirror,
>>> which in turn is presumably because the canonical repo at
>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq-artemis.git does
>>> too.
>>>
>>> I would hope infra can update the descriptions without recreating the
>>> mirrors again, I'll ask and see.
>>>
>>> On 22 May 2015 at 01:16, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suconic@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> too late :)
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 7:53 PM, Robbie Gemmell
>>>> <robbie.gemmell@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Err, I'd maybe hold up until tomorrow and give other folks a chance to
>>>>> chime in, the below was only one persons opinion hehe.
>>>>>
>>>>> When I say 'now' vs 'later' I just meant the immediate term verus
>>>>> months from now. I dont think its that big a deal that it has to
>>>>> happen *right now* :)
>>>>>
>>>>> Robbie
>>>>>
>>>>> On 22 May 2015 at 00:30, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suconic@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>>> Ok, I won't even wait for other people's feedback... I will just
go
>>>>>> ahead and ask them to do it. Better now than later.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 7:03 PM, Robbie Gemmell
>>>>>> <robbie.gemmell@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> As the JIRA project has just been renamed today and no release
has
>>>>>>> occurred yet, I think now would probably be the best time to
ever
>>>>>>> recreate the mirror.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I dont think the pull requests numbers beginning again is that
big an
>>>>>>> issue. The comments are available on the dev list as you said,
and
>>>>>>> also any JIRAs the PR referenced, plus the commits made will
remain
>>>>>>> for inspection. There will obviously be some overlap with the
old
>>>>>>> numbers, but I dont think that should be too confusing as the
dates
>>>>>>> will make it fairly easy to tell whether it is a current reference
or
>>>>>>> an old one, plus any JIRA references will further help distinguish
>>>>>>> them (given the old PR commits would refer to the old ACTIVEMQ6
JIRA
>>>>>>> key, rather than the new ARTEMIS key).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> One other issue to note is that I believe forks of the current
GitHub
>>>>>>> mirror will be re-parented against one of the remaining fork,
so
>>>>>>> people might need to recreate their forks against the main repo
again.
>>>>>>> I dont see that as too big a deal either though, and again better
done
>>>>>>> now than later.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Robbie
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 21 May 2015 at 22:42, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suconic@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>>>>> I need some help with the discussion I'm having at:
>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9543
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If you go to the artemis github mirror, you will see: mirrored
from
>>>>>>>> git://git.apache.org/activemq-6.git
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It happens that per what I heard from Infra, the only way
to do that
>>>>>>>> would be to recreate the repo. Meaning the Pull Request IDs
would
>>>>>>>> restart, meaning we would lost any previous discussions we
had on
>>>>>>>> github.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Although I'm not sure that's really a big deal, since these
>>>>>>>> discussions are all backed up at the dev list (the dev list
has been
>>>>>>>> hearing the PR comments).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So, is there anyone against recreating the repo?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I asked Infra to wait until tomorrow.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Clebert Suconic
>>>>>> http://community.jboss.org/people/clebert.suconic@jboss.com
>>>>>> http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Clebert Suconic
>>>> http://community.jboss.org/people/clebert.suconic@jboss.com
>>>> http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com
>



-- 
Clebert Suconic
http://community.jboss.org/people/clebert.suconic@jboss.com
http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com

Mime
View raw message