activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mark Frazier <mmfraz...@me.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSSION] Renaming github mirror
Date Fri, 22 May 2015 17:39:18 GMT
Robbie, I’m still rather new to Apache and the open source community, so I’m a little confused.

When you say “Infra”, what exactly are you referring to? Is this a part of the Apache
team?

Thanks

> On May 22, 2015, at 7:52 AM, Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemmell@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Infra have updated the 3 repos/mirrors so they now say ActiveMQ Artemis.
> 
> Robbie
> 
> On 22 May 2015 at 09:20, Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemmell@gmail.com> wrote:
>> The GitHub mirror has been recreated, and now correctly says it is
>> mirroring from the git://git.apache.org/activemq-artemis.git asf
>> mirror.
>> 
>> It does however still have a description that it is a "Mirror of
>> Apache ActiveMQ 6". That is presumably because http://git.apache.org
>> still shows a description of "Apache ActiveMQ 6" against its mirror,
>> which in turn is presumably because the canonical repo at
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq-artemis.git does
>> too.
>> 
>> I would hope infra can update the descriptions without recreating the
>> mirrors again, I'll ask and see.
>> 
>> On 22 May 2015 at 01:16, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suconic@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> too late :)
>>> 
>>> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 7:53 PM, Robbie Gemmell
>>> <robbie.gemmell@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Err, I'd maybe hold up until tomorrow and give other folks a chance to
>>>> chime in, the below was only one persons opinion hehe.
>>>> 
>>>> When I say 'now' vs 'later' I just meant the immediate term verus
>>>> months from now. I dont think its that big a deal that it has to
>>>> happen *right now* :)
>>>> 
>>>> Robbie
>>>> 
>>>> On 22 May 2015 at 00:30, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suconic@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>> Ok, I won't even wait for other people's feedback... I will just go
>>>>> ahead and ask them to do it. Better now than later.
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 7:03 PM, Robbie Gemmell
>>>>> <robbie.gemmell@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> As the JIRA project has just been renamed today and no release has
>>>>>> occurred yet, I think now would probably be the best time to ever
>>>>>> recreate the mirror.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I dont think the pull requests numbers beginning again is that big
an
>>>>>> issue. The comments are available on the dev list as you said, and
>>>>>> also any JIRAs the PR referenced, plus the commits made will remain
>>>>>> for inspection. There will obviously be some overlap with the old
>>>>>> numbers, but I dont think that should be too confusing as the dates
>>>>>> will make it fairly easy to tell whether it is a current reference
or
>>>>>> an old one, plus any JIRA references will further help distinguish
>>>>>> them (given the old PR commits would refer to the old ACTIVEMQ6 JIRA
>>>>>> key, rather than the new ARTEMIS key).
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> One other issue to note is that I believe forks of the current GitHub
>>>>>> mirror will be re-parented against one of the remaining fork, so
>>>>>> people might need to recreate their forks against the main repo again.
>>>>>> I dont see that as too big a deal either though, and again better
done
>>>>>> now than later.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Robbie
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 21 May 2015 at 22:42, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suconic@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>>>> I need some help with the discussion I'm having at:
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9543
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> If you go to the artemis github mirror, you will see: mirrored
from
>>>>>>> git://git.apache.org/activemq-6.git
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> It happens that per what I heard from Infra, the only way to
do that
>>>>>>> would be to recreate the repo. Meaning the Pull Request IDs would
>>>>>>> restart, meaning we would lost any previous discussions we had
on
>>>>>>> github.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Although I'm not sure that's really a big deal, since these
>>>>>>> discussions are all backed up at the dev list (the dev list has
been
>>>>>>> hearing the PR comments).
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> So, is there anyone against recreating the repo?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I asked Infra to wait until tomorrow.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> Clebert Suconic
>>>>> http://community.jboss.org/people/clebert.suconic@jboss.com
>>>>> http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Clebert Suconic
>>> http://community.jboss.org/people/clebert.suconic@jboss.com
>>> http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com


Mime
View raw message