activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mark Frazier <mmfraz...@me.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSSION] Renaming github mirror
Date Fri, 22 May 2015 18:07:12 GMT
Thanks!

> On May 22, 2015, at 10:44 AM, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suconic@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Infra (short for infra-structure)  is a team at apache that handles
> things like JIRA, git integration... etc
> 
> On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Mark Frazier <mmfrazier@me.com> wrote:
>> Robbie, I’m still rather new to Apache and the open source community, so I’m
a little confused.
>> 
>> When you say “Infra”, what exactly are you referring to? Is this a part of the
Apache team?
>> 
>> Thanks
>> 
>>> On May 22, 2015, at 7:52 AM, Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemmell@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>> 
>>> Infra have updated the 3 repos/mirrors so they now say ActiveMQ Artemis.
>>> 
>>> Robbie
>>> 
>>> On 22 May 2015 at 09:20, Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemmell@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> The GitHub mirror has been recreated, and now correctly says it is
>>>> mirroring from the git://git.apache.org/activemq-artemis.git asf
>>>> mirror.
>>>> 
>>>> It does however still have a description that it is a "Mirror of
>>>> Apache ActiveMQ 6". That is presumably because http://git.apache.org
>>>> still shows a description of "Apache ActiveMQ 6" against its mirror,
>>>> which in turn is presumably because the canonical repo at
>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq-artemis.git does
>>>> too.
>>>> 
>>>> I would hope infra can update the descriptions without recreating the
>>>> mirrors again, I'll ask and see.
>>>> 
>>>> On 22 May 2015 at 01:16, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suconic@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>> too late :)
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 7:53 PM, Robbie Gemmell
>>>>> <robbie.gemmell@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Err, I'd maybe hold up until tomorrow and give other folks a chance
to
>>>>>> chime in, the below was only one persons opinion hehe.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> When I say 'now' vs 'later' I just meant the immediate term verus
>>>>>> months from now. I dont think its that big a deal that it has to
>>>>>> happen *right now* :)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Robbie
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 22 May 2015 at 00:30, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suconic@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>>>> Ok, I won't even wait for other people's feedback... I will just
go
>>>>>>> ahead and ask them to do it. Better now than later.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 7:03 PM, Robbie Gemmell
>>>>>>> <robbie.gemmell@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> As the JIRA project has just been renamed today and no release
has
>>>>>>>> occurred yet, I think now would probably be the best time
to ever
>>>>>>>> recreate the mirror.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I dont think the pull requests numbers beginning again is
that big an
>>>>>>>> issue. The comments are available on the dev list as you
said, and
>>>>>>>> also any JIRAs the PR referenced, plus the commits made will
remain
>>>>>>>> for inspection. There will obviously be some overlap with
the old
>>>>>>>> numbers, but I dont think that should be too confusing as
the dates
>>>>>>>> will make it fairly easy to tell whether it is a current
reference or
>>>>>>>> an old one, plus any JIRA references will further help distinguish
>>>>>>>> them (given the old PR commits would refer to the old ACTIVEMQ6
JIRA
>>>>>>>> key, rather than the new ARTEMIS key).
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> One other issue to note is that I believe forks of the current
GitHub
>>>>>>>> mirror will be re-parented against one of the remaining fork,
so
>>>>>>>> people might need to recreate their forks against the main
repo again.
>>>>>>>> I dont see that as too big a deal either though, and again
better done
>>>>>>>> now than later.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Robbie
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On 21 May 2015 at 22:42, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suconic@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>>>>>> I need some help with the discussion I'm having at:
>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9543
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> If you go to the artemis github mirror, you will see:
mirrored from
>>>>>>>>> git://git.apache.org/activemq-6.git
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> It happens that per what I heard from Infra, the only
way to do that
>>>>>>>>> would be to recreate the repo. Meaning the Pull Request
IDs would
>>>>>>>>> restart, meaning we would lost any previous discussions
we had on
>>>>>>>>> github.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Although I'm not sure that's really a big deal, since
these
>>>>>>>>> discussions are all backed up at the dev list (the dev
list has been
>>>>>>>>> hearing the PR comments).
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> So, is there anyone against recreating the repo?
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> I asked Infra to wait until tomorrow.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Clebert Suconic
>>>>>>> http://community.jboss.org/people/clebert.suconic@jboss.com
>>>>>>> http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> Clebert Suconic
>>>>> http://community.jboss.org/people/clebert.suconic@jboss.com
>>>>> http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Clebert Suconic
> http://community.jboss.org/people/clebert.suconic@jboss.com
> http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com


Mime
View raw message