Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-activemq-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 794BB1796A for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2015 00:48:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 11984 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2015 00:48:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-dev-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 11923 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2015 00:48:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 11911 invoked by uid 99); 9 Apr 2015 00:48:39 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Apr 2015 00:48:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: error (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.217.173] (HELO mail-lb0-f173.google.com) (209.85.217.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Apr 2015 00:48:34 +0000 Received: by lbbuc2 with SMTP id uc2so76244931lbb.2 for ; Wed, 08 Apr 2015 17:47:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=hUlvog50JmZlLUbuxacWxCR815NPHvicz4P8QwoZbho=; b=R0vQpQH0WPk7LbXI6u+1zXNstIyn4TB5woHZJviVgKQt06DSJrnedRD9JQ/ah3k0xA Fdb7EUbQI+w8sddCtfMtJHKQjlDVCGf230Nk2k0lObyS84Z6T7Znx5MPRH/7FgjWKS7q 5iRI+Sefwgw3WVuq0M0aYvbhE3iUbKkENu8yqMvZz82F10hNHgJ37+dkIVHRJ2z0/r7/ jJpB+8HQdNIO0jYXMfp5emxoR4qDFfH52Ngj7PfXwOLVqr/e8xp2/El6yroc5slfy7nO Qt9aS6IewcdtB5tyYNbRl0SpNYeXNqVImu8UmUew/Yc+EjgDgBYimDo+ZDYtCAOWVYCP Ce8Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm7mOjQpNy2B3pk7eKLDEv/UoBSvcJfAxi8b8i+OXcbwOH2fG3IY860b9/THTB0HqS2JW7h MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.90.201 with SMTP id by9mr25098061lbb.30.1428540473714; Wed, 08 Apr 2015 17:47:53 -0700 (PDT) Sender: jcarman@carmanconsulting.com Received: by 10.112.29.167 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Apr 2015 17:47:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2015 20:47:53 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: CaU1IQ9OQBgLPLdygznyXCi3OvM Message-ID: Subject: Re: Naming Suggestions? From: James Carman To: "dev@activemq.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1134664a7bbd2705133fffb0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001a1134664a7bbd2705133fffb0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I believe nest is trademarked already. Is it cold in here? ;) On Wednesday, April 8, 2015, Clebert Suconic wrote: > *If* we have to rename anything, I liked the name "Nest" as the > ActiveMQ Nest broker > > On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Hiram Chirino > wrote: > > Naming things is hard. If we gave the hornetq code grant a code name > > other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be avoid lots of TM > > confusion. Anybody have any suggestion what would be a good name to > > give it? > > > > -- > > Hiram Chirino > > Engineering | Red Hat, Inc. > > hchirino@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com > > skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino > > > > -- > Clebert Suconic > http://community.jboss.org/people/clebert.suconic@jboss.com > http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com > --001a1134664a7bbd2705133fffb0--