Mailing-List: contact dev-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@activemq.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of clebert.suconic@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.217.170 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAKprHVZRiRg5mP0_UxypTB+RuFoXp8WdMYLALLLbjGyo3LLWhg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <55127628.2030008@gmail.com>
	<CAH+vQmMZhnLJNRc4Y761RTv9OZxc6+drVRM-EEeKRR3xYTEOUw@mail.gmail.com>
	<1427299537888-4693805.post@n4.nabble.com>
	<D138C4EF.2177C3%chris.mattmann@gmail.com>
	<CAOqetn_zfD4YbRp6xP25cOw6x-xnLciM7axjM-vE2nx+XdWicw@mail.gmail.com>
	<D1396B16.218038%chris.mattmann@gmail.com>
	<CAGZ-RDJqn_EfL1sxbaosGdDntnMWvev0+0dEWXVXgyo5Thsosg@mail.gmail.com>
	<551575A8.5080509@rcbowen.com>
	<CAKprHVZT9uPr06Cbau_Wtq+uPGPZ45MwEj3wGJ=ebKYSUnNcaA@mail.gmail.com>
	<A767551B-CCBC-4EBC-8EEA-2DC17FB5F730@jaguNET.com>
	<551941FD.8090807@redhat.com>
	<20F84CAB-6009-47F4-8AE7-B75711CBA4DB@jaguNET.com>
	<CABD8fLUQ1c7KeF1+cwn0Pk7S=Djcza=nAWow756dTWZXRz5a3Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<D1470DC4.244547%chris.mattmann@gmail.com>
	<CAH+vQmPSLZpdLr7E0ZjKeoYQ5fV4viC=bEkKEjEqS0dWhXCimQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<D14A9EE5.247818%chris.mattmann@gmail.com>
	<CAA66Tpr=e_veZt=rM+eQHy9qQ-iH6BpnzPo79c8n=5+v5f54FA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAKprHVaFczvCEneUNnN+x2i9kOvfswOssjwQziqD3-3posRpKQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAKF+bso_n9Ohpw+igKDA51LhjC876uo5ShufX1=WTJ9DSe+hQw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAKprHVZRiRg5mP0_UxypTB+RuFoXp8WdMYLALLLbjGyo3LLWhg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2015 15:30:37 -0400
Message-ID: 
 <CAKF+bsrFJuQBp--er9e40iF6rpbHLrPd1=BAu-kaqEpRA1J_kQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS} HornetQ & ActiveMQ's next generation
From: Clebert Suconic <clebert.suconic@gmail.com>
To: "dev@activemq.apache.org" <dev@activemq.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

that's because every communication. any website update is in wait mode now.


I'm asking someone to either update or take that page down.  So
whatever is written at [1] is "Lorem Ipsum" text. and was supposed to
be there for a period so short that nobody would have noticed it if
the release happened.


[1] http://activemq.apache.org/activemq6.html

On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 3:14 PM, David Nalley <david@gnsa.us> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Clebert Suconic
> <clebert.suconic@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> .. while it seems that the
>>> HornetQ open source project and community are continuing to develop
>>> that same codebase and community external to the ASF as well as inside
>>> the ASF (often by the same people working in both communities.)
>>
>>
>>  there are no developments or features being done at the hornetq
>> codebase.We are only doing eventual bug fixes for current users and we
>> will commit fixes on both codebases when needed, which is actually
>> benefitial for the new codebase.
>
> That's interesting, thanks for the clarification.
> My confusion is from on the one hand seeing statements about HornetQ
> being the future of ActiveMQ[1], yet seemingly no mention of ActiveMQ
> at all on the HornetQ project's site. In fact everything continues to
> point to joining the HornetQ community, participating with the HornetQ
> community, etc, as if business was carrying on as normal. It is true
> that the HornetQ repos seem to be close to idle at this point.
>
> --David
>
> [1] http://activemq.apache.org/activemq6.html


-- 
Clebert Suconic
http://community.jboss.org/people/clebert.suconic@jboss.com
http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com