Mailing-List: contact dev-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@activemq.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of chirino@gmail.com designates
 209.85.220.175 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: chirino@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: 
 <CALznzY6Qcq14p3Jwu0j4iNDxqR49=fi6V89D4rFB_DS0GXanpA@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CALznzY6Qcq14p3Jwu0j4iNDxqR49=fi6V89D4rFB_DS0GXanpA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 11:52:02 -0400
Message-ID: 
 <CAGZ-RDLfZTaPOe9fhAQYNy+UYA8jkzgu6ovyXoO56T+cZqLOzQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] ActiveMQ {CodeName} Web Console...
From: Hiram Chirino <hiram@hiramchirino.com>
To: ActiveMQ-Developers <dev@activemq.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

+1 Angular is a great way to go :)
I'd recommend using a Bootstrap 3 also.

On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 11:40 AM, James Carman
<james@carmanconsulting.com> wrote:
> The new codebase does not include a web console for management
> purposes.  If it is to be the next generation ActiveMQ, it will need
> this feature.  Here at ApacheCon, we have talked a bit about it.  Thus
> far, folks seem happy with the idea of an AngularJS-based front-end
> which talks to ActiveMQ using Jolokia only.  Something this large
> obviously needs to be discussed with the whole community, thus this
> email.
>
> James


-- 
Hiram Chirino
Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
hchirino@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com
skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino