Mailing-List: contact dev-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@activemq.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mtaylor@redhat.com designates
 209.132.183.28 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <5524FE45.9040207@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2015 11:09:09 +0100
From: Martyn Taylor <mtaylor@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
 rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] dev mailing list is cluttered
References: <1428417792042-4694420.post@n4.nabble.com>
	<1428428963175-4694438.post@n4.nabble.com>
	<1428430737432-4694440.post@n4.nabble.com>
	<CAMgYm0zq9qyXJv5FHp7_XLuZCzjp_RdKxxv6GX24xLv=U78tTQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<1428431774631-4694448.post@n4.nabble.com>
	<CAMgYm0x_Nb3FrSkhP0-vBF_vhjPKHyMv52Souo+_pcJGmhpLyA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALznzY6sRnznrJfBvFuQ5c_2KuWShQ6KR2R+uYsraZyA3Y31jQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALznzY7rSOoRLOU7Ct2UQN8H=6waL7sPa9SA34njbmDt_BQF-w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGZ-RDKGmx65aPw6_q2a7JTM8Na6AQPo6hkGpg0F6i_pd9+T9A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALznzY6pDAA8GaWrdHmdS8oZiH+Vktooo+5i_Qb0W4uXY2eRwA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMgYm0yG0kaBbRN6dJ0V_ETRcnUyLo0Jn=A+rajUJDrumt8Fsw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGZ-RDJv7FBxij1Y7T7+dvzeEBy5NCAO98Wze2akUbtjNcu4Og@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALznzY5ELoZDKySCs4YENfpVRk=Lqugu6eDf_UidXuFXSrJSew@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGeZ+bgjhKfY8eJXi73_BFCeYNWa3jYz3mb1GMhqS_DAchNptg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGeh-pH1-+7npP-uF-iVtMAUrSjgdJJxaEzf10k9hCvLiQQAaQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAGeh-pH1-+7npP-uF-iVtMAUrSjgdJJxaEzf10k9hCvLiQQAaQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

+1 for separate JIRA list.  issues@activemq.apache.org makes sense to me.

On 08/04/15 10:46, Dejan Bosanac wrote:
> +1 for separate lists
>
> Regards
> --
> Dejan Bosanac
> ----------------------
> Red Hat, Inc.
> dbosanac@redhat.com
> Twitter: @dejanb
> Blog: http://sensatic.net
> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 11:56 PM, Jim Gomes <e.semog@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 for lazy consensus.
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015, 1:44 PM James Carman <james@carmanconsulting.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Sounds good.  There's no reason to rush this by any stretch of the
>>> imagination.  Lazy consensus is just fine for this sort of thing, I'd
>>> think.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Hiram Chirino <hiram@hiramchirino.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> How about this.. Lets request the change 72 hours after this thread
>>>> was started. So 3 days - 5 hours :)  That way, we lets folks in
>>>> different time zones get a chance to object if they want.  After that
>>>> we can call it lazy consensus and be done with it.
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 4:30 PM, Bruce Snyder <bruce.snyder@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>> I don't think we need a vote, but I won't stand in the way of one.
>>>>>
>>>>> Bruce
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 2:26 PM, James Carman <
>>> james@carmanconsulting.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Unless anyone objects, I don't think we need an "official" VOTE.
>> Thus
>>>>>> far, it appears we have consensus.  Anyone?  Anyone?  Bueller?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Hiram Chirino <
>> hiram@hiramchirino.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> Do we need an official vote thread for these kinds of changes?
>>>>>>> Perhaps this discussion thread is good enough?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 3:14 PM, James Carman <
>>> james@carmanconsulting.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> I think we need to have Hiram request this since he is the chair
>> of
>>> the
>>>>>> PMC.
>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, April 7, 2015, James Carman <
>> james@carmanconsulting.com
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Actually the mailing lists are different
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://infra.apache.org/officers/mlreq
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, April 7, 2015, Bruce Snyder <bruce.snyder@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','bruce.snyder@gmail.com');>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Anything that requires assistance from the Infra team is
>>> accomplished
>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>> creating a JIRA issue. Just create a new issue in JIRA (
>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa) and
>> select
>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> Infrastructure project.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Bruce
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 12:36 PM, artnaseef <art@artnaseef.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Hey Bruce - I would like to learn the process here.  Can you
>>> help
>>>>>> me?
>>>>>>>>>>> Was the request made simply by creating a Jira entry?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> View this message in context:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-dev-
>>> mailing-list-is-cluttered-tp4694420p4694448.html
>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at
>> Nabble.com.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> perl -e 'print
>>>>>>>>>> unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\
>>> "YC;VT*"
>>>>>> );'
>>>>>>>>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
>>>>>>>>>> Blog: http://bruceblog.org/
>>>>>>>>>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Hiram Chirino
>>>>>>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
>>>>>>> hchirino@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com
>>>>>>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> perl -e 'print
>>>>> unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
>>> );'
>>>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
>>>>> Blog: http://bruceblog.org/
>>>>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Hiram Chirino
>>>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
>>>> hchirino@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com
>>>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino