activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bruce Snyder <>
Subject Re: Plan clarification
Date Fri, 17 Apr 2015 18:47:15 GMT
Since your concerns are with regard to the board report, this discussion
should be taking place on that discussion thread on the PMC mailing list,
not on the dev list. Can you please move this discussion there, Hadrian?


On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <> wrote:

> I would like the report to explain why the hornetq donation could/should
> not happen in the incubator. The <code> podling currently lacks diversity.
> Hiding it under the activemq project complicates the diversity problems
> that already exist in activemq. It seems to me that by keeping it under
> activemq the intention is to subvert the diversity requirement without
> which it would not graduate from the incubator. This would be detrimental
> both to the activemq project and especially to the <code> project.
> The <code> subproject may also take any direction best fit for the project
> in the incubator without expectations of compatibility with activemq (which
> under activemq will likely cause further friction).
> Best,
> Hadrian
> On 04/17/2015 01:52 PM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
>> I just wanted to highlight what I a assume is the natural result of
>> using a code name for the code donation:
>>      Apache ActiveMQ will have multiple products with multiple versions:
>>               a.  ActiveMQ - (version 5.x.x)
>>               b.  ActiveMQ ${codename} - (version 1.x.x)
>> This means that we are not yet ready to declare that ActiveMQ
>> ${codename} is the successor to ActiveMQ 5.x.  We will wait until the
>> product matures to make that decision.
>> If anyone disagrees, please speak up cause that's what I'm reporting
>> to the board.

perl -e 'print
unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );'

ActiveMQ in Action:

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message