activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] ActiveMQ {CodeName} Must-Have Features...
Date Wed, 15 Apr 2015 16:41:27 GMT
well.. we have Hierarchical queues. I"m not sure if it's the same thing.

On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Clebert Suconic
<clebert.suconic@gmail.com> wrote:
> We already have Message Groups.. .maybe someone could review it to
> check if it's compatible.. (It should be BTW.. we used to compete)
>
>
> for OSGI:  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACTIVEMQ6-93
>
> Virtual Topics: again: we already have it... needs to check if it's
> totally compatible (which should be)
>
>
>
>
> AutoCreate: we already have it.. and I'm improving it this week.. so
> it shouldn't be a problem.
>
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Daniel Guggi <daniel.guggi@gmail.com> wrote:
>> correction "Message Destinations" -> "Message Groups"
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 6:27 PM, Daniel Guggi <daniel.guggi@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> @Configuration format file
>>> I as a user wouldn't mind either
>>>
>>> Features I'd also like to have in v6
>>> - Message Destinations (afaik already...)
>>> - Virtual Destination/Topics support
>>> - and big +1 for "Auto-creation of destinations"
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 6:03 PM, Clebert Suconic <
>>> clebert.suconic@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> It wasn't clear to me if the format of the Configuration file is
>>>> really important or not. If I was the user i wouldn't mind.
>>>>
>>>> Users will have to change the configs anyways... things like the
>>>> journal will have new settings... paging address... address-settings..
>>>> other things.. but if the XML taste is a big thing it could be
>>>> revisited.
>>>>
>>>> I just wanted to clear that before we jumped ahead into writing code for
>>>> it.
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 10:56 AM, James Carman
>>>> <james@carmanconsulting.com> wrote:
>>>> > In order for ActiveMQ {CodeName} to take over as the next generation
>>>> > of ActiveMQ, it obviously must have some level of feature parity with
>>>> > the existing ActiveMQ 5.x (or 6.x if it's released before that
>>>> > transition) offering.  We should come up with some level of a roadmap
>>>> > together about which features are required.  Thus far, the only
>>>> > big-ticket items that have been addressed are:
>>>> >
>>>> > 1.  The OpenWire protocol is supported
>>>> > 2.  Auto-creation of destinations (mostly complete).
>>>> >
>>>> > This is obviously not all of what the existing ActiveMQ is all about.
>>>> > What other features are folks wanting to see in the next generation
>>>> > ActiveMQ?
>>>> >
>>>> > James
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Clebert Suconic
>>>> http://community.jboss.org/people/clebert.suconic@jboss.com
>>>> http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
> --
> Clebert Suconic
> http://community.jboss.org/people/clebert.suconic@jboss.com
> http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com



-- 
Clebert Suconic
http://community.jboss.org/people/clebert.suconic@jboss.com
http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com

Mime
View raw message