activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Legacy support for HornetQ
Date Tue, 14 Apr 2015 17:14:52 GMT
+1


On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org> wrote:
>
> It’s one thing to “support” the old keys and another thing entirely to make that
the default and only option for developers to use right now.   If I download the new release
from Apache (having never been a HornetQ user) and start writing apps and such, I SHOULD be
using AMQ* keys and properties, not HQ* keys.   Thus, I think the patch needs to do something
like:
>
> private static final SimpleString AMQ_PROPNAME = new SimpleString("_AMQ_”);
> @Deprecated
> private static final SimpleString HQ_PROPNAME = new SimpleString("_HQ_");
>
> and update the code to handle both at this point with plans to remove the HQ_ stuff at
some point in the future.
>
> Does that make sense?
>
> Dan
>
>
>> On Apr 14, 2015, at 12:47 PM, Bruce Snyder <bruce.snyder@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I'm currently at ApacheCon working with Hiram and Clebert and I have
>> learned that the HornetQ project is now considered a legacy project -- the
>> code is no longer maintained as the open source project HornetQ. The
>> expectation is to migrate the HornetQ user base to the ActiveMQ community.
>> We (the ActiveMQ community) still need to draft a plan of action for steps
>> to take with the HornetQ code donation, and I think that this could be one
>> of the things that is identified in that plan to help merge the two
>> communities. When combining communities in this manner, the goals of the
>> merger cannot be achieved without some level of compromise and I see this
>> is as a minor compromise. Therefore, I see no issue with providing backward
>> compatibility because it is a minor level of effort and yet it helps to
>> provide a migration path for users of HornetQ (the HornetQ community) to
>> make use of ActiveMQ <codename>.
>>
>> Bruce
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 11:30 AM, Tracy Snell <tsnell@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACTIVEMQ6-97 <
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACTIVEMQ6-97> in the comments
>>> indicates that AMQ6 needs to provide legacy support for HornetQ. This is a
>>> surprise to me and I haven’t seen anything where this was mentioned as part
>>> of the plan (and it’s entirely possible I just missed it). So I’m just
>>> wanting clarification, with the HornetQ donation is ActiveMQ now required
>>> to provide legacy support for HornetQ clients?
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> perl -e 'print
>> unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );'
>>
>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
>> Blog: http://bruceblog.org/
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
>
> --
> Daniel Kulp
> dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>



-- 
Clebert Suconic
http://community.jboss.org/people/clebert.suconic@jboss.com
http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com

Mime
View raw message