activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Gomes <jgo...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Should ActiveMQ {CodeName} Support Backward Compatibility with HornetQ...
Date Wed, 15 Apr 2015 17:37:01 GMT
There's a difference between should and can. Is this a short term support
via deprecated and planned obsolescence, or is it long term first class
support? I don't really know much about what the HornetQ support entails.

On Wed, Apr 15, 2015, 9:18 AM Clebert Suconic <clebert.suconic@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I think it doesn't hurt to do it. it's only beneficial.
>
>
> The concern probably started from this Pull Request:
> https://github.com/apache/activemq-6/pull/205
>
> Which we will merge it.. I will just extend the change to coupe with
> old clients.
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Hiram Chirino <hiram@hiramchirino.com>
> wrote:
> > Yep.  I think supporting old HornetQ clients should be a goal too.  If
> > it's not too much effort will open our projects to more users which I
> > think is a good thing.
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 11:43 AM, James Carman
> > <james@carmanconsulting.com> wrote:
> >> It has come to light that some folks feel that ActiveMQ {CodeName}
> >> should support backward compatibility with HornetQ.  I don't think
> >> this has been discussed specifically within the community yet, so I
> >> thought I'd bring it up.
> >>
> >> James
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Hiram Chirino
> > Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
> > hchirino@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com
> > skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>
>
>
> --
> Clebert Suconic
> http://community.jboss.org/people/clebert.suconic@jboss.com
> http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message