activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Gomes <e.se...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Naming Suggestions?
Date Thu, 09 Apr 2015 00:39:40 GMT
I vote for ActiveMQ-RS. Four reasons:

1. RS stands for Research.
2. RS is alphabetically sequential after Q, and it's fun to say.
3. Seriously doubt it'll clash with a trademarked name.
4. Fits with our other existing sub-project naming conventions
(ActiveMQ-NMS, ActiveMQ-CPP, etc.).
 On Apr 8, 2015 3:06 PM, "Greg Stein" <gstein@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 05:34:37PM -0400, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> >...
> > That said, since what we are talking about is a code name and not a
> > name of a *Project* SHOULD be easier (but again, we'll verify with
> > trademarks@ when we've decided on  name).   The name should always
> > be referred to as "Apache ActiveMQ-BLAH" and never "Apache BLAH" or
> > just "BLAH".  The exception would be the normal dev chatter on our
> > dev list.  This is just like the Apache ActiveMQ-NMS and Apache
> > ActiveMQ-CMS we have now.
>
> Right. Since "ActiveMQ" will be in its release name, you've already
> got your trademark bits handled, and avoided conflict with anything
> else. Find a codename and move along. trademarks@ isn't really needed
> as long as it remains a sub-name of ActiveMQ. Chris is just reacting
> strongly because of the past use of HornetQ, which is RH's mark. That
> is past, so we can skip worrying about that.
>
> I look forward to your choices, and the Board report in a couple weeks.
>
> Cheers,
> -g
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message