activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>
Subject Re: Naming Suggestions?
Date Fri, 10 Apr 2015 14:55:13 GMT
+1

On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 10:29 AM, James Strachan
<james.strachan@gmail.com> wrote:
> How about "ActiveMQ Reactive"? as its based on a different reactive/netty
> broker kernel (so its descriptive), its easy to remember & spell and has a
> hipster ring to it too ;)
>
> On 8 April 2015 at 21:23, Hiram Chirino <hiram@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
>
>> Naming things is hard.  If we gave the hornetq code grant a code name
>> other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be avoid lots of TM
>> confusion.  Anybody have any suggestion what would be a good name to
>> give it?
>>
>> --
>> Hiram Chirino
>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
>> hchirino@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com
>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>>
>
>
>
> --
> James
> -------
> Red Hat
>
> Twitter: @jstrachan
> Email: jstracha@redhat.com
> Blog: http://macstrac.blogspot.com/
>
> hawtio: http:/ <http://fusesource.com/>/hawt.io/
> fabric8: http:/ <http://fusesource.com/>/fabric8.io/
>
> Open Source Integration



-- 
Hiram Chirino
Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
hchirino@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com
skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino

Mime
View raw message