activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Richard Kettelerij <richardkettele...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] HornetQ Code Donation should use a codename
Date Sun, 12 Apr 2015 10:30:44 GMT
Although I do not have a problem with naming it ActiveMQ 6, given al the
discussion I agree this is the best option going forward, so +1
(non-binding).

On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 4:51 AM, Ninad Sheth <ninadexpert7070@gmail.com>
wrote:

> +1
> On Apr 11, 2015 10:57 PM, "Bruce Snyder" <bruce.snyder@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Bruce
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 7:06 AM, Hiram Chirino <hiram@hiramchirino.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Lots of confusion has occurred since we did not use a code name for
> > > the code donation from the start.  Everyone refers to it as HornetQ
> > > which adds to the Trademark confusions.  Also the current state of the
> > > code is not ready to become ActiveMQ 6.  We can figure out what the
> > > code name should be later with community and trademarks input.
> > >
> > > Please choose an option:
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 : Rename the hornetq code grant source code from ActiveMQ 6 to
> > > an ActiveMQ ${codename}
> > > [ ] -1 : No don't rename
> > > [ ] 0 : No preference
> > >
> > > Vote is open for 72 hours.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Hiram Chirino
> > > Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
> > > hchirino@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com
> > > skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > perl -e 'print
> > unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );'
> >
> > ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
> > Blog: http://bruceblog.org/
> > Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message