activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rob Davies <rajdav...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Naming Suggestions?
Date Fri, 10 Apr 2015 18:54:37 GMT
Message processing is done by one thread driven event loop- like node.js. Though in reality,
it would be multi reactor - with multiple event loops - maybe one per core. Apollo,HornetQ,
vert.x are examples of this using this pattern



> On 10 Apr 2015, at 18:42, Justin Bertram <jbertram@apache.com> wrote:
> 
> That's not a definition of "reactive."  It's just an example of its use.  What does it
actually mean that the broker is "reactive"?
> 
> 
> Justin
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Christian Posta" <christian.posta@gmail.com>
> To: dev@activemq.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 12:28:53 PM
> Subject: Re: Naming Suggestions?
> 
> I like jstrachan's definition: "based on a different, reactive/netty broker
> kernel"
> 
>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Justin Bertram <jbertram@apache.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Any of those in favor of "Reactive"...In the event that this name is
>> actually chosen, do you have a simple definition of what "reactive" means
>> in this context so it can explained to those who don't know?
>> 
>> I don't particularly care what it's code-named.  You could call it
>> "Bertha" if you like.  I don't think it matters much at the end of the day.
>> 
>> 
>> Justin
>> 
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Christian Posta" <christian.posta@gmail.com>
>> To: dev@activemq.apache.org
>> Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 11:16:58 AM
>> Subject: Re: Naming Suggestions?
>> 
>> I like that! REActiveMQ
>> 
>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Dejan Bosanac <dejan@nighttale.net>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> I like Reactive, as it also gives nice options for logo and other visual
>>> stuff, like (RE)ActiveMQ
>>> 
>>> Regards
>>> --
>>> Dejan Bosanac
>>> ----------------------
>>> Red Hat, Inc.
>>> dbosanac@redhat.com
>>> Twitter: @dejanb
>>> Blog: http://sensatic.net
>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Clebert Suconic <
>>> clebert.suconic@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> I am.. but I thought about the coffee  :)
>>>> 
>>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:12 AM, James Carman
>>>> <james@carmanconsulting.com> wrote:
>>>>> No Battlestar Galactica fans?
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Friday, April 10, 2015, James Carman <james@carmanconsulting.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> How about Starbuck?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Friday, April 10, 2015, Gary Tully <gary.tully@gmail.com
>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','gary.tully@gmail.com');>>
wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I am with you Martyn, something very easy to spell and pronounce
>>> would
>>>>>>> be my preference too :-)
>>>>>>> Luna hits the mark.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 10 April 2015 at 10:37, Martyn Taylor <mtaylor@redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> After being stung in the past working on the "Aeolus" project.
>> I'd
>>>>>>> prefer
>>>>>>>> to have a name that is super easy to spell and pronounce.
Artemis
>>> is
>>>>>>> pushing
>>>>>>>> it a little for me.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> How about something really simple, like "Luna", Roman moon
>> goddess.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On 09/04/15 14:18, James Carman wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> It is a good name.  Do we need to engage trademarks@
for code
>>>> names?
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, April 9, 2015, Hiram Chirino <
>> hiram@hiramchirino.com
>>>> 
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> I do like Artemis.  ActiveMQ Artemis has a nice ring
to it.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Christian Posta
>>>>>>>>>> <christian.posta@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Nice, Dan! ArtemisMQ! I like it.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 8, 2015, at 4:23 PM, Hiram Chirino
<
>>>> hiram@hiramchirino.com
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> <javascript:;>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Naming things is hard.  If we gave the
hornetq code grant a
>>> code
>>>>>>> name
>>>>>>>>>>>>> other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think
we would be avoid
>>> lots
>>>>>>> of TM
>>>>>>>>>>>>> confusion.  Anybody have any suggestion
what would be a good
>>>> name
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> give it?
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hermes?    That would be Apollo’s half
brother.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Or Artemis, Apollo’s twin sister.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Dan
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hiram Chirino
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> hchirino@redhat.com <javascript:;>
| fusesource.com |
>>>> redhat.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> Daniel Kulp
>>>>>>>>>>>> dkulp@apache.org <javascript:;> - http://dankulp.com/blog
>>>>>>>>>>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> *Christian Posta*
>>>>>>>>>>> twitter: @christianposta
>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.christianposta.com/blog
>>>>>>>>>>> http://fabric8.io
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Hiram Chirino
>>>>>>>>>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
>>>>>>>>>> hchirino@redhat.com <javascript:;> | fusesource.com
|
>> redhat.com
>>>>>>>>>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Clebert Suconic
>>>> http://community.jboss.org/people/clebert.suconic@jboss.com
>>>> http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> *Christian Posta*
>> twitter: @christianposta
>> http://www.christianposta.com/blog
>> http://fabric8.io
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> *Christian Posta*
> twitter: @christianposta
> http://www.christianposta.com/blog
> http://fabric8.io

Mime
View raw message