activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Hadrian Zbarcea <>
Subject Re: Plan clarification
Date Fri, 17 Apr 2015 18:15:19 GMT
I would like the report to explain why the hornetq donation could/should 
not happen in the incubator. The <code> podling currently lacks 
diversity. Hiding it under the activemq project complicates the 
diversity problems that already exist in activemq. It seems to me that 
by keeping it under activemq the intention is to subvert the diversity 
requirement without which it would not graduate from the incubator. This 
would be detrimental both to the activemq project and especially to the 
<code> project.

The <code> subproject may also take any direction best fit for the 
project in the incubator without expectations of compatibility with 
activemq (which under activemq will likely cause further friction).


On 04/17/2015 01:52 PM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
> I just wanted to highlight what I a assume is the natural result of
> using a code name for the code donation:
>      Apache ActiveMQ will have multiple products with multiple versions:
>               a.  ActiveMQ - (version 5.x.x)
>               b.  ActiveMQ ${codename} - (version 1.x.x)
> This means that we are not yet ready to declare that ActiveMQ
> ${codename} is the successor to ActiveMQ 5.x.  We will wait until the
> product matures to make that decision.
> If anyone disagrees, please speak up cause that's what I'm reporting
> to the board.

View raw message