activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Martyn Taylor <mtay...@redhat.com>
Subject Re: Naming Suggestions?
Date Fri, 10 Apr 2015 15:17:37 GMT
+1

On 10/04/15 15:55, Hiram Chirino wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 10:29 AM, James Strachan
> <james.strachan@gmail.com> wrote:
>> How about "ActiveMQ Reactive"? as its based on a different reactive/netty
>> broker kernel (so its descriptive), its easy to remember & spell and has a
>> hipster ring to it too ;)
>>
>> On 8 April 2015 at 21:23, Hiram Chirino <hiram@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Naming things is hard.  If we gave the hornetq code grant a code name
>>> other than HornetQ or ActiveMQ 6, I think we would be avoid lots of TM
>>> confusion.  Anybody have any suggestion what would be a good name to
>>> give it?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Hiram Chirino
>>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
>>> hchirino@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com
>>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> James
>> -------
>> Red Hat
>>
>> Twitter: @jstrachan
>> Email: jstracha@redhat.com
>> Blog: http://macstrac.blogspot.com/
>>
>> hawtio: http:/ <http://fusesource.com/>/hawt.io/
>> fabric8: http:/ <http://fusesource.com/>/fabric8.io/
>>
>> Open Source Integration
>
>


Mime
View raw message