activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From redboy1972 <redboy1...@live.com>
Subject Re: Future of Apollo...
Date Fri, 10 Apr 2015 20:26:05 GMT
Thanks for the response.

Very saddened to hear this but expected this to be the response.

By the way, I really appreciated your posts at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-apollo/blob/trunk/apollo-stomp/src/test/scala/org/apache/activemq/apollo/stomp/test/UserOwnershipSecurityFactory.scala#L29
and
https://github.com/apache/activemq-apollo/blob/trunk/apollo-stomp/src/test/resources/apollo-stomp-custom-security.xml#L18

As they allowed me to figure out how to do my own custom authorization.

See:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/29424952/dynamic-destination-in-apache-apollo-mq/29527865#29527865

Back to my question:
According to https://activemq.apache.org/new-features-in-60.html, it appears
as if the lessons learned in Apollo would be used to enhance a future
ActiveMQ 6 line.  Is this still planned?  If so will it be something usable
by my company by Q4?

I have been testing brokers for 3 weeks and Apollo's characteristics are
hands down the best.  Something was done VERY right.  Gratz.




--
View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Future-of-Apollo-tp4694644p4694737.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Mime
View raw message