Mailing-List: contact dev-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@activemq.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of clebert.suconic@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.215.42 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1426807969583-4693508.post@n4.nabble.com>
References: <54FF0A4D.9000801@redhat.com>
	<5502057C.2050402@redhat.com>
	<5507F341.8010604@redhat.com>
	<1426805812244-4693505.post@n4.nabble.com>
	<495B2752-D304-4E43-8E20-809D0287884C@gmail.com>
	<1426807969583-4693508.post@n4.nabble.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 19:48:01 -0400
Message-ID: 
 <CAKF+bsr+EgSNaMoXQQ6kYc2yJYkt+qcz1e3m_ZSKKseUjfnK5A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 6.0.0 (RC3)
From: Clebert Suconic <clebert.suconic@gmail.com>
To: "dev@activemq.apache.org" <dev@activemq.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

I agree it's an issue. I disagree it's a blocker.

as I said anyone can just switch the directory to any other folder for
the log output.

On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 7:32 PM, artnaseef <art@artnaseef.com> wrote:
> There is a bigger concern here.  Apache project releases are source code
> releases.  The intent is for folks to be able to work in these directories.
>
> Failing the build on license checks on non-build files is going to be a
> concern.  It just doesn't make sense - and it should be easy to fix.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-ActiveMQ-6-0-0-tp4692911p4693508.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-- 
Clebert Suconic
http://community.jboss.org/people/clebert.suconic@jboss.com
http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com