Mailing-List: contact dev-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@activemq.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of gary.tully@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.217.171 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1427229644497-4693768.post@n4.nabble.com>
References: 
 <CAJ9DK3zcLSOcmahaRz=tEmGufSWqX4cfkyi2x5N_T_DUKSYqtg@mail.gmail.com>
	<55118D02.6090902@gmail.com>
	<43BE8045-27EC-4ED2-8484-11930356E380@apache.org>
	<55119196.7030607@gmail.com>
	<1427214991662-4693742.post@n4.nabble.com>
	<A6FD5863-C883-4561-B912-B1850138DBBB@yahoo.com>
	<5511BAA5.6060409@gmail.com>
	<5511C550.3000804@gmail.com>
	<CAGZ-RDLZQ3JJne8hi1dogySShWmqvQckYUMBm+_XK0GYX8yvHQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<5511C894.3030801@gmail.com>
	<1427229644497-4693768.post@n4.nabble.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 12:31:43 +0000
Message-ID: 
 <CAH+vQmNcva9LCYs6ujh=BAjSYHE_wWA-2tMS8V_aMaEOPZKu5Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 6.0.0 (RC3)
From: Gary Tully <gary.tully@gmail.com>
To: "dev@activemq.apache.org" <dev@activemq.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Art,
what would stop the current trunk jumping from 5.x to 7.x and skipping
6, if the need arose?

On 24 March 2015 at 20:40, artnaseef <art@artnaseef.com> wrote:
> Agreed.
>
> Preventing the existing ActiveMQ code base from moving from the 5.x to a 6.x
> version is a bad thing.
>
> We already have violated the rules of semantic versioning because of this
> (e.g. the renaming of all MBeans that was not backward-compatible).
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-ActiveMQ-6-0-0-tp4692911p4693768.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.