Mailing-List: contact dev-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@activemq.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of burtonator2011@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.214.175 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: burtonator2011@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <1426782403553-4693463.post@n4.nabble.com>
References: 
 <CAAZU44m1qJ45WyA1K-cFj5Z7mdC9h8dRYDotCwipDY9knRiskQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKF+bspY9ADgAgv8qcZCcA5sadOogOxcjeBjiSKVMiphiSwpdw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAAZU44=vuv3+N1rQpqNpprwsQU9kewJ8g8Aumgu21wH-XgGqcw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKF+bsqXqDDOnKzVikH=Jc0xwJvDx-ErR4N4ywFNB=2XHcDhXw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAAZU44mknp1e_bDQLaEN9Tzz4t6HAkhKRj+j9gSvBXSx8sSGeQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGeh-pGgDBMD5Q8to_7DP53mGuKcPfKqWfW4R+334SSTU-QC0Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <1426782403553-4693463.post@n4.nabble.com>
From: Kevin Burton <burton@spinn3r.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 12:40:09 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CAAZU44=ZT0Mn916gfTgqCPKcsQah5VAAMe_YPCF5-2yRZ5Xbhg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: ActiveMQ 6.0.0 required Java 8?
To: "dev@activemq.apache.org" <dev@activemq.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1134e2ec48fd680511a95fd4

--001a1134e2ec48fd680511a95fd4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Actually, this is probably the right way to phrase it.  Maybe just on the
HOME PAGE of AMQ 6 just have a call out.

I think it=E2=80=99s fair to work on a new broker because ActiveMQ 5 would =
need a
lot of work in a lot of areas to modernize it.

That said. It think the 5.x series should also be maintained for a while.
So maybe just having them clearly explained that they are different things.

Also, is Apollo dead and development officially moving to AMQ6 ?  if so
perhaps the best strategy is to mark it as so.

On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 9:26 AM, artnaseef <art@artnaseef.com> wrote:

> ActiveMQ *is* what we can only distinguish clearly right now as ActiveMQ
> 5.x.
>
> The ActiveMQ 6 name was once used for Apollo and now it's used for Hornet=
Q.
> Yes, it's confusing.
>
> Personally, I will be referring to the existing ActiveMQ
> (https://github.com/apache/activemq), and only that code base, as
> ActiveMQ -
> until we have a plan that somehow one replaces the other.  If you catch m=
e
> using "AMQ 6" or "AMQ 5" outside the discussion of naming, please smack m=
e
> in the back of the head ;-).
>
> I'm sorry for your confusion.  It is a major concern that you were confus=
ed
> and spent time and effort to work on HornetQ when you thought you were
> upgrading ActiveMQ.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-6-0-0-required-Java-8-tp46=
93434p4693463.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>


--=20

Founder/CEO Spinn3r.com
Location: *San Francisco, CA*
blog: http://burtonator.wordpress.com
=E2=80=A6 or check out my Google+ profile
<https://plus.google.com/102718274791889610666/posts>
<http://spinn3r.com>

--001a1134e2ec48fd680511a95fd4--