activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 6.0.0 (RC3)
Date Fri, 20 Mar 2015 17:26:18 GMT
I think the point is from the user's perspective it's not a complete
rewrite.  Most things look and smell like good ole Tomcat when you
upgrade.  Sure there are new features sprinkled about, but you don't
have to learn everything anew.


On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Hiram Chirino <hiram@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
> Tomcat has had complete re-writes.  That's what major ver number
> change can mean.
>
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 12:30 PM, artnaseef <art@artnaseef.com> wrote:
>> One thing I see different here from other project major version bumps - we're
>> still talking a complete rewrite.  With something like Tomcat 7 to Tomcat 8,
>> there's still a reasonable expectation that the knowledge carried from
>> working with Tomcat 7 carries forward to Tomcat 8 (e.g. the artifacts are
>> likely to have the same purposes; config files are likely to carry the same
>> name, etc).  While major versions will break some of that, a good amount
>> usually remains.
>>
>> For that reason, I'm on the fence about the -M1 idea.  I like the
>> distinguishing name approach.
>>
>> How about activemq-ng (ng = next-gen)?
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-ActiveMQ-6-0-0-tp4692911p4693549.html
>> Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
>
> --
> Hiram Chirino
> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
> hchirino@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com
> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino

Mime
View raw message