activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>
Subject Re: CPU core/thread scaling test
Date Fri, 27 Mar 2015 13:23:27 GMT
Oh, I misunderstood.  Gotcha.  I was thinking the idea was that AMQ
wasn't doing a good job spreading itself across the available
cores/CPUs.  I'm picking up what you're putting down now.  Thanks,
Hiram.

On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 9:11 AM, Hiram Chirino <hiram@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
> What ideally should happen is that under high load the network should
> be the bottleneck.  But right now CPU is the bottleneck.
>
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 8:53 AM, James Carman
> <james@carmanconsulting.com> wrote:
>> Is the expected behavior that even under high load AMQ would only be
>> using one core/CPU, or less than it could/should be in some way?
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 8:37 AM, Jamie G. <jamie.goodyear@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Thank you for the links - I'll try setting this up on my test lab.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Jamie
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Gary Tully <gary.tully@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> you can also use the producer/consumer examples from a distro.
>>>> Last time I was trying to saturate a network I uses some of the scripts at
>>>> https://github.com/gtully/broker-run/blob/master/scripts/clients.sh
>>>>
>>>> I have not been in there for a while but you may find it useful to run
>>>> parallel load over multiple destinations.
>>>>
>>>> On 27 March 2015 at 10:14, Jamie G. <jamie.goodyear@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>
>>>>> It was mentioned on another thread that ActiveMQ has hard challenges
>>>>> with CPU core/thread scaling - I was wondering if there was a test
>>>>> case/script published some where that shows this issue occurring?
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Jamie
>
>
>
> --
> Hiram Chirino
> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
> hchirino@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com
> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino

Mime
View raw message