activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>
Subject Re: CPU core/thread scaling test
Date Fri, 27 Mar 2015 13:11:14 GMT
What ideally should happen is that under high load the network should
be the bottleneck.  But right now CPU is the bottleneck.

On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 8:53 AM, James Carman
<james@carmanconsulting.com> wrote:
> Is the expected behavior that even under high load AMQ would only be
> using one core/CPU, or less than it could/should be in some way?
>
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 8:37 AM, Jamie G. <jamie.goodyear@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Thank you for the links - I'll try setting this up on my test lab.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Jamie
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Gary Tully <gary.tully@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> you can also use the producer/consumer examples from a distro.
>>> Last time I was trying to saturate a network I uses some of the scripts at
>>> https://github.com/gtully/broker-run/blob/master/scripts/clients.sh
>>>
>>> I have not been in there for a while but you may find it useful to run
>>> parallel load over multiple destinations.
>>>
>>> On 27 March 2015 at 10:14, Jamie G. <jamie.goodyear@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> It was mentioned on another thread that ActiveMQ has hard challenges
>>>> with CPU core/thread scaling - I was wondering if there was a test
>>>> case/script published some where that shows this issue occurring?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Jamie



-- 
Hiram Chirino
Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
hchirino@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com
skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino

Mime
View raw message