Mailing-List: contact dev-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@activemq.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of hzbarcea@gmail.com designates
 209.85.192.54 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <54D8187A.6090206@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 21:16:26 -0500
From: Hadrian Zbarcea <hzbarcea@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: [HEADS-UP][DISCUSS] Renaming "trunk" to "master"
References: <54AAD792.9050903@gmail.com>
	<CAFitrpRmB93W-JpUo6rFvg9=4hu2ew5dKXe+VBpTwxs-6K_FoQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGeh-pH++1FYF8VH0_R_PqfzyPwbjKRKDwR4gcaBvfSCTcK_eA@mail.gmail.com>
 <54D13A2C.8020603@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <54D13A2C.8020603@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Hi,

I created the master branch myself.

INFRA-9111 is still open. I don't have the karma to remove the 'trunk' 
branch. Please use 'master' from now on. Let's follow the commits to 
trunk and merge them to master, make sure nothing gets lost.

Cheers,
Hadrian


On 02/03/2015 04:14 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> Per agreement in this thread, now that 5.11.0 is out, I sent a request 
> to infra [1] to rename trunk to master.
> Please keep an eye on it so you don't loose work.
>
> Cheers,
> Hadrian
>
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9111
>
>
> On 01/06/2015 07:58 AM, Dejan Bosanac wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> Maybe we should wait with the rename until we have 5.11.0 released 
>> (there’s
>> some work involved like reconfiguring jenkins and stuff, so it'll delay
>> release)
>>
>> Regards
>> -- 
>> Dejan Bosanac
>> ----------------------
>> Red Hat, Inc.
>> dbosanac@redhat.com
>> Twitter: @dejanb
>> Blog: http://sensatic.net
>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 1:44 PM, Robbie Gemmell 
>> <robbie.gemmell@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 for the rename.
>>>
>>> Using "master" is typical and this is definitely a change now made by
>>> infra during migrations, based on experience of migrating a couple of
>>> things into Git repos at Qpid recently.
>>>
>>> On 5 January 2015 at 18:27, Hadrian Zbarcea <hzbarcea@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> It's a bit confusing, a leftover from the svn days.
>>>>
>>>> I think the rename was supposed to happen but it was somehow 
>>>> overlooked.
>>> Any
>>>> objection to rename?
>>>>
>>>> Hadrian
>