activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>
Subject Re: Message Groups and long running transactions
Date Fri, 06 Feb 2015 13:52:48 GMT
Hi George,

If your consumer uses low prefetch (like 1), you should get the same effect.

On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 7:01 PM, George K <gkibilov@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> If a solution has been identified on how to ensure that long running
> transactions don't cause delays for messages from other message groups
> please share.
>
> Basically it would work if broker only assigned messages from a *new*
> message group to a free consumer and never to a consumer that is busy
> processing something already. So only messages form already assigned group
> can be assigned prior to dispatch.
>
> Without this working load balancing pretty much is broken for systems that
> can encounter one off long running transactions.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Message-Groups-and-long-running-transactions-tp3499325p4691136.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



-- 
Hiram Chirino
Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
hchirino@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com
skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino

Mime
View raw message