Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-48364-apmail-activemq-dev-archive=activemq.apache.org@activemq.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-activemq-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1E29F17CC0
	for <apmail-activemq-dev-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Thu, 29 Jan 2015 13:44:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 81389 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jan 2015 13:44:09 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-dev-archive@activemq.apache.org
Received: (qmail 81323 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jan 2015 13:44:09 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@activemq.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@activemq.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@activemq.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.activemq.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@activemq.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@activemq.apache.org
Received: (qmail 81311 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jan 2015 13:44:09 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 13:44:09 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0
	tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of gary.tully@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.217.180 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.217.180] (HELO mail-lb0-f180.google.com)
 (209.85.217.180)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 13:44:03 +0000
Received: by mail-lb0-f180.google.com with SMTP id b6so28078857lbj.11
        for <dev@activemq.apache.org>; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 05:42:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=DQrZwWfIsjl3MQKbpeenoQxowJcTLA44nj6gYEGlbsw=;
        b=ZWh2gOdIrPaCWyX2eveuyQWpJfebVt80rXT4/hfx6WSyX22tF6ht9Fdsdv90hSSxDh
         HbnQ7ThD1YlsVWoXE1vfBWWM47YMaAJYmG3aKtoYWRtn4tQNMs7X/wARDp7sPqQn/K1C
         p+RM/8GktVSnpuqIYJ6dhiDXTk+EvQe/hxBkOpmZpyXuVybMF4s6X+prs3ZwO3dTL8vp
         9BMU8lzStLlItAHuTevKTfyrurRYTCK+o1I6t0Iy687OhEAhliweTizBhCSNirX5TSwr
         +KkMMe0TXqAYoNwj2K8RbhtciO3WWEeXFYsFOOCPY+VuufcA2OBHuZ1BhXkxCVF34iOB
         9i2A==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.234.69 with SMTP id uc5mr877408lac.16.1422538977691;
 Thu, 29 Jan 2015 05:42:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.25.82.73 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 05:42:57 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 13:42:57 +0000
Message-ID: 
 <CAH+vQmOwiNJCpqRWQLhtaFEJs6QF9EENMTVQaz6d+56r8KSo=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: [DISCUSS] Have every committer on the PMC by default
From: Gary Tully <gary.tully@gmail.com>
To: "dev@activemq.apache.org" <dev@activemq.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

In that way, committers that are interested in project management
duties can indicate same with their votes. Effectively self elect to
step up to the task.

What is the down side?