activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Soeren D (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (AMQ-4965) Dequeue count for Topics increase for non-durable subscribers but not for durable subscribers
Date Wed, 14 Jan 2015 13:47:34 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14276913#comment-14276913
] 

Soeren D commented on AMQ-4965:
-------------------------------

The fact that " the dequeue count on a topic is not very meaningful." - is very confusing
for people who start with JMS.
Please document this anywhere. I've searched so long for this information and came across
similar questions without good answers.

> Dequeue count for Topics increase for non-durable subscribers but not  for durable subscribers
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMQ-4965
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4965
>             Project: ActiveMQ
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 5.8.0
>            Reporter: Abhi
>
> Discussion:- http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Message-Dequeue-count-in-jconsole-0-even-after-messages-are-recieved-and-consumed-by-subscribers-tp4675875.html
> Currently, the Dequeue count metric for Topics is inconsistent in case of durable and
non-durable subscribers. It increases for non-durable subscribers but not for durable subscribers.
Moreover, the dequeue count on a topic is not very meaningful. It can be changed so that topic
dequeue counts are not updated at all. 
> Also, it would be nice if such information is properly documented somewhere in ActiveMQ
docs as I couldn't find any information regarding  this behavior in ActiveMQ docs. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message