activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ActiveMQ 5.10.1 (3rd attempt)
Date Mon, 19 Jan 2015 22:05:04 GMT
So much for a quick answer. ;-) I am not alone in my thinking. Obviously
someone else feels the same way, the author of that document. It is not a
huge issue to me, otherwise I would've voted -1.  Regardless, I am happy to
see you more frequent releases out of this project. It is a great sign!

On Monday, January 19, 2015, Hadrian Zbarcea <hzbarcea@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi James,
>
> We can debate this off the vote thread if you prefer, but a quick answer
> would be that the PMC approves a release. It has absolutely no relation
> with who builds it.
>
> (check) the release process requires code modifications (pom.xml) it MUST
> be performed by a committer.
> (check) artifacts MUST be digitally signed (PGP) key.
> (check) Key MUST be recorded in the repository (KEYS)
> (check) Key SHOULD be published in a public key store
> (check) Key SHOULD be signed by another ASFer
>
> The only awkward aspect is that if the release manager is not a PMC
> member, he has a non-binding vote on his own release. So if a community
> trusts a committer to build a legally binding release, it probably trusts
> him to provide project oversight. That's one way to build merit to become a
> PMC member. So I don't see anything improper to prompt a *negative* zero.
>
> Cheers,
> Hadrian
>
>
> On 01/19/2015 03:48 PM, James Carman wrote:
>
>> Hadrian,
>>
>> I'm not inventing anything and I didn't say it was a rule, only my
>> preference:
>>
>> "Note that the PMC is responsible for all artifacts in their distribution
>> directory, which is a subdirectory of www.apache.org/dist/ ; and all
>> artifacts placed in their directory must be signed by a committer,
>> preferably by a PMC member. It is also necessary for the PMC to ensure
>> that
>> the source package is sufficient to build any binary artifacts associated
>> with the release."
>>
>> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html
>>
>>
>> On Monday, January 19, 2015, Hadrian Zbarcea <hzbarcea@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>  +1 (binding)
>>>
>>> Looks good, solid release, improvement from 5.10.0. Comments:
>>>
>>> * sigs, legal files, look good
>>> * build from source looks good (DbRestartJDBCQueueMasterSlaveL
>>> easeQuiesceTest
>>> failed, passed on second run)
>>> * smoke test in karaf looks good
>>> * this is actually the 4th attempt
>>> * @James: are we inventing new rules?
>>>
>>> Somebody, I think Dejan, suggested we should have automated builds on the
>>> maintenance branches to spot regressions earlier. Great suggestion, not
>>> sure if we should do it for 5.10.x, but definitely for 5.11.x.
>>>
>>> @Art, great work! This was your first release at ASF if I am not
>>> mistaken,
>>> right?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Hadrian
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 01/15/2015 12:23 PM, James Carman wrote:
>>>
>>>  -0, I would prefer to see the releases signed by a PMC member.
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 12:10 PM, artnaseef <art@artnaseef.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  The release candidate for the activemq 5.10.1 release is now built and
>>>>> ready
>>>>> for a vote.
>>>>> This release comes with 34 fixes and 1 administrative jira entry.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please see the list of jira entries here:
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=fixVersion%
>>>>> 20%3D%205.10.1%20AND%20project%20%3D%20AMQ
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You can get binary distributions here:
>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>>>> orgapacheactivemq-1013/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/5.10.1/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Source archives are here:
>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>>>> orgapacheactivemq-1013/org/apache/activemq/activemq-parent/5.10.1/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Maven2 repository is here:
>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>>>> orgapacheactivemq-1013/
>>>>>
>>>>> Source tag:
>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq.git;a=commit;h=
>>>>> 8938d14d434447193b02ba635606aa0fb7a80353
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> NOTE: I used Hadrian's prior thread as a template (thank you Hadrian).
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.
>>>>> nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Apache-ActiveMQ-5-10-1-3rd-
>>>>> attempt-tp4689959.html
>>>>> Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message