Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-activemq-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 62D7511A5B for ; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 18:45:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 27536 invoked by uid 500); 22 Sep 2014 18:45:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-dev-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 27478 invoked by uid 500); 22 Sep 2014 18:45:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 27466 invoked by uid 99); 22 Sep 2014 18:45:07 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 18:45:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,URI_HEX,URI_TRY_3LD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of tabish121@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.41 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.41] (HELO mail-qa0-f41.google.com) (209.85.216.41) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 18:44:41 +0000 Received: by mail-qa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id cm18so571826qab.14 for ; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 11:44:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7s69kByuKnlg3wi0FLrqH9gGhVV3mR9yOTzqPEs3Nvo=; b=C4vGrOj+EygRcLXDuscX6sJH8J2ZquCngQLh2nxcUN+1QXO+zl9UErN2yA7AGiv9+v w3PzkXU71TAVXXOrf8GLuvnZzQRBfkAhdCUXVj1SddcQ/rW2RwCo5QPqwosHu2eFVE7I 8xZ5btkkAgWHzzrwtrDo5OgupvOa29jQZJZZIThUtXevAak0i7s9uLvWZ8GU+/rkbBZz mopjHhrEMXhGHHQAJEJySQ6nUjfkzNN8tzNGeYzu7snXTn+TBOVBaR/4KEEBLJ9GTrLk ShMRGLvlg7YJos3JAc5Npnb/4DjxQ7tPHY5fSOKLHDPq12WlfQCFR42DpwUDwAyGkgUi hSFQ== X-Received: by 10.224.46.133 with SMTP id j5mr5579239qaf.92.1411411480089; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 11:44:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.150] (c-76-100-129-91.hsd1.va.comcast.net. [76.100.129.91]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id y9sm7913259qaf.15.2014.09.22.11.44.39 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 22 Sep 2014 11:44:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <54206E17.7070502@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 14:44:39 -0400 From: Timothy Bish User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: did the isDuplicate memory leak? References: <1411375826931-4685768.post@n4.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <1411375826931-4685768.post@n4.nabble.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 09/22/2014 04:50 AM, xinsheng wrote: > > did the isDuplicate memory leak? should i set not check duplicate? > is anybody happend this? > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/did-the-isDuplicate-memory-leak-tp4685768.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > Use v3.8.1 or higher and this shouldn't be an issue, latest release is v3.8.3 -- Tim Bish Sr Software Engineer | RedHat Inc. tim.bish@redhat.com | www.redhat.com skype: tabish121 | twitter: @tabish121 blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/