activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Chris Mattmann <mattm...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] Move the ActiveMQ web-console to a sub-project.
Date Sat, 01 Feb 2014 07:26:00 GMT
Hi Rob,

I'm glad that's your definition of blatant abuse -- it's not my definition
at all.

My definition starts with a PMC that knowingly shipped a big front-facing
part of 
its product that had links all over it to technical documents, youtube
videos, company 
specific information and yet didn't have anything remotely resembling
Apache as a first 
class citizen.

So yes, it's more than shipping a web console from another OS Apache
License project.
You (part of the Apache ActiveMQ PMC) help to ship an Apache endorsed
release that 
didn't respect Apache IMO and got the attention of trademarks and the
Apache board.

Cheers,
Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Davies <rajdavies@gmail.com>
Reply-To: <dev@activemq.apache.org>
Date: Friday, January 31, 2014 11:20 PM
To: <dev@activemq.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] Move the ActiveMQ web-console to a
sub-project.

>
>> 
>>  the blatant abuse of this
>> PMC of Apache brands,
>
>Abuse of the Apache brands would be calling a product ³Apache ESB² - a
>project that doesn¹t exist at the ASF, but trying to get marketing
>through association with the Apache brand.
>We (ActiveMQ PMC)  shipped a web console from another OS Apache Licence
>project.  Please explain the blatant abuse?
>
>
>Rob Davies
>‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹
>Red Hat, Inc
>http://hawt.io - #dontcha
>Twitter: rajdavies
>Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com
>ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>



Mime
View raw message