activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [HEADS-UP] ActiveMQ 5.10.0 release
Date Thu, 06 Feb 2014 07:50:33 GMT
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 12:25 AM, Paul Gale <paul.n.gale@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If release 5.10.0 of ActiveMQ is going to be cut then you might as
> well update the bundled Camel from 2.12.1 to 2.12.2, no? According to
> the Camel site this dot release contains 145 fixes.
>

Yes I have logged ticket for this
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5030

We need to release Camel first and then upgrade AMQ to include the
latest Camel release.
The Camel source code on 2.12 branch is ready for release, so if you
have free cycles then IMHO its better to start with Camel and then
afterwards AMQ.

> Thanks,
> Paul
>
> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 3:32 PM,  <jb@nanthrax.net> wrote:
>> Hi Hadrian,
>>
>> I have some OSGi related enhancements and fixes to push, but nothing blocker
>> for the release (the blockers haven been already pushed).
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>>
>> On 2014-02-05 18:15, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
>>>
>>> I have enough cycles to cut a 5.10.0 this week off of the current
>>> trunk as Hiram suggested. Is there any issue/fix I should wait for?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Hadrian
>>>
>>>
>>> On 02/03/2014 10:41 AM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I think it's safest to to just call trunk 5.10 now since it is taking
>>>> away some functionality.  Would be nice to get some RCs going soon
>>>> since trunk is stable right now.
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <hzbarcea@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I am still planning to release 5.9.1. We need to figure out if we want
>>>>> to
>>>>> cut 5.9.1 off of the current trunk at a stable checkpoint, or branch
it
>>>>> off
>>>>> 5.9.0 and just select the relevant patches. While the feedback on this
>>>>> list
>>>>> is not conclusive (and I personally favor the 1st approach) I believe
>>>>> most
>>>>> would favor the 2nd approach. Last week there were over 200 patches that
>>>>> we'd have to look through and backport. The fastest we could get through
>>>>> this the sooner we'll have the release, I hope before mid Feb.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Hadrian
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 01/30/2014 03:31 PM, kal123 wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There were post for cutting 5.9.1 any update on timeline for this?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> View this message in context:
>>>>>> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/activemq-5-9-1-tp4677074.html
>>>>>> Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>



-- 
Claus Ibsen
-----------------
Red Hat, Inc.
Email: cibsen@redhat.com
Twitter: davsclaus
Blog: http://davsclaus.com
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen
Make your Camel applications look hawt, try: http://hawt.io

Mime
View raw message