activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Hadrian Zbarcea <hzbar...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [HEADS-UP] ActiveMQ 5.10.0 release
Date Thu, 06 Feb 2014 14:18:36 GMT
Will do. Looks like we're waiting for the vote on cxf 2.7.10 then. As 
soon as artifacts are published I'll release camel and then activemq.
Hadrian


On 02/06/2014 02:50 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 12:25 AM, Paul Gale <paul.n.gale@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> If release 5.10.0 of ActiveMQ is going to be cut then you might as
>> well update the bundled Camel from 2.12.1 to 2.12.2, no? According to
>> the Camel site this dot release contains 145 fixes.
>>
> Yes I have logged ticket for this
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5030
>
> We need to release Camel first and then upgrade AMQ to include the
> latest Camel release.
> The Camel source code on 2.12 branch is ready for release, so if you
> have free cycles then IMHO its better to start with Camel and then
> afterwards AMQ.
>
>> Thanks,
>> Paul
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 3:32 PM,  <jb@nanthrax.net> wrote:
>>> Hi Hadrian,
>>>
>>> I have some OSGi related enhancements and fixes to push, but nothing blocker
>>> for the release (the blockers haven been already pushed).
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2014-02-05 18:15, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
>>>> I have enough cycles to cut a 5.10.0 this week off of the current
>>>> trunk as Hiram suggested. Is there any issue/fix I should wait for?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Hadrian
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 02/03/2014 10:41 AM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
>>>>> I think it's safest to to just call trunk 5.10 now since it is taking
>>>>> away some functionality.  Would be nice to get some RCs going soon
>>>>> since trunk is stable right now.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <hzbarcea@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am still planning to release 5.9.1. We need to figure out if we
want
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> cut 5.9.1 off of the current trunk at a stable checkpoint, or branch
it
>>>>>> off
>>>>>> 5.9.0 and just select the relevant patches. While the feedback on
this
>>>>>> list
>>>>>> is not conclusive (and I personally favor the 1st approach) I believe
>>>>>> most
>>>>>> would favor the 2nd approach. Last week there were over 200 patches
that
>>>>>> we'd have to look through and backport. The fastest we could get
through
>>>>>> this the sooner we'll have the release, I hope before mid Feb.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Hadrian
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 01/30/2014 03:31 PM, kal123 wrote:
>>>>>>> There were post for cutting 5.9.1 any update on timeline for
this?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> View this message in context:
>>>>>>> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/activemq-5-9-1-tp4677074.html
>>>>>>> Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>
>


Mime
View raw message