Mailing-List: contact dev-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@activemq.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of rajdavies@gmail.com
 designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender)
From: Robert Davies <rajdavies@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="Apple-Mail=_65C8DC45-4234-4AD2-A6CC-55805326A5E7"
Message-Id: <415B70B2-420E-481B-AA89-F50DB346D799@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\))
Subject: Re: Cutting a 5.9.1 release??
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 06:19:22 +0000
References: <CEE71629.41A5A%joshua.watkins@gamesys.co.uk>
 <C8CBF474-4349-48AB-91EC-3A7FD7D965E7@apache.org>
 <52D70141.4060103@gmail.com>
To: dev@activemq.apache.org
In-Reply-To: <52D70141.4060103@gmail.com>

--Apple-Mail=_65C8DC45-4234-4AD2-A6CC-55805326A5E7
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=windows-1252

So removing something as visual as a console should be a point release  =
(5.10) - and we have a large number of critical issues open (currently =
20) - we should try get those resolved or properly assessed.  Hopefully =
we can get 5.10 out really quickly.

On 15 Jan 2014, at 21:44, Hadrian Zbarcea <hzbarcea@gmail.com> wrote:

> The issue is now fixed. Time to finally cut 5.9.1? I volunteer to do =
it if no objections or other takers.
>=20
> Hadrian
>=20
>=20
>=20
> On 01/02/2014 04:28 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>>=20
>> On Dec 30, 2013, at 7:30 AM, Joshua Watkins =
<joshua.watkins@gamesys.co.uk> wrote:
>> This topic seems to have stalled. Is the release still waiting on
>>> something?
>>=20
>>=20
>> I *think* there were a couple remaining things:
>>=20
>> 1) Removing the hawt.io stuff to meet Apache requirements.  I =
submitted a pull request for this today.  Hopefully someone can pick it =
up and get it committed.
>>=20
>> 2) Figuring out why the ActiveMQ feature cannot be installed into =
Karaf.  Basically makes it very hard to get ActiveMQ running in OSGi.  =
(AMQ-4833)  I spent some time on this today and logged an issue with =
Maven Central.  Hopefully they can open up the restrictions on their =
end.  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-2536 is also logged =
for this.   Anyway, not something that the ActiveMQ community can do =
anything about so likely not a holdup anymore.
>>=20
>> Anyone have anything else?
>>=20
>> Dan
>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>> Regards,
>>> Josh
>>>=20
>>> On 11/12/2013 16:23, "Dejan Bosanac" <dejan@nighttale.net> wrote:
>>>=20
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4909 is now fixed.
>>>>=20
>>>> Regards
>>>> --
>>>> Dejan Bosanac
>>>> ----------------------
>>>> Red Hat, Inc.
>>>> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
>>>> dbosanac@redhat.com
>>>> Twitter: @dejanb
>>>> Blog: http://sensatic.net
>>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Dejan Bosanac =
<dejan@nighttale.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>=20
>>>>> Or just explain upgrade path it in release notes. I'll get it =
fixed now.
>>>>>=20
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> --
>>>>> Dejan Bosanac
>>>>> ----------------------
>>>>> Red Hat, Inc.
>>>>> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
>>>>> dbosanac@redhat.com
>>>>> Twitter: @dejanb
>>>>> Blog: http://sensatic.net
>>>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>>>>>=20
>>>>>=20
>>>>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Robert Davies
>>>>> <rajdavies@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>=20
>>>>>> Why not just go for a 5.10 and get this fixed ?
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>> On 11 Dec 2013, at 11:13, Dejan Bosanac <dejan@nighttale.net> =
wrote:
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>> I agree with this. We should remove activemq-camel from =
activemq-osgi
>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> use it as a separate bundle. I'm not sure though if it's a good =
fix
>>>>>> for
>>>>>> a
>>>>>>> minor release as we need to change features as well. Also =
upgrade
>>>>>> from
>>>>>>> 5.9.0 to 5.9.1 in karat would mean you need to upgrade =
activemq-osgi
>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> add activemq-camel. What do you guys think?
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Dejan Bosanac
>>>>>>> ----------------------
>>>>>>> Red Hat, Inc.
>>>>>>> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
>>>>>>> dbosanac@redhat.com
>>>>>>> Twitter: @dejanb
>>>>>>> Blog: http://sensatic.net
>>>>>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Raul Kripalani =
<raul@evosent.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>> Would there be a chance to take a look at
>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4909 for the 5.9.1
>>>>>> release?
>>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>> This is a blocker that prevents users from upgrading the AMQ =
broker
>>>>>> within
>>>>>>>> an Karaf / ServiceMix container, if they also use Camel.
>>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>> Try upgrading from AMQ 5.8 to 5.9, and you get
>>>>>> ClassNotFoundExceptions
>>>>>>>> because activemq-camel 5.9.0 expects the Camel =
EndpointCompleter
>>>>>> which
>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>> introduced in later versions.
>>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>> *Ra=FAl Kripalani*
>>>>>>>> Apache Camel PMC Member & Committer | Enterprise Architect, =
Open
>>>>>> Source
>>>>>>>> Integration specialist
>>>>>>>> http://about.me/raulkripalani |
>>>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani
>>>>>>>> http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk
>>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Dejan Bosanac
>>>>>> <dejan@nighttale.net>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>>> All good on my side.
>>>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Dejan Bosanac
>>>>>>>>> ----------------------
>>>>>>>>> Red Hat, Inc.
>>>>>>>>> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
>>>>>>>>> dbosanac@redhat.com
>>>>>>>>> Twitter: @dejanb
>>>>>>>>> Blog: http://sensatic.net
>>>>>>>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>>>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Robert Davies
>>>>>> <rajdavies@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>>>> I=B9m having a look at AMQ-4924 - but that can wait till 5.10 =
-
>>>>>>>> presumably
>>>>>>>>>> that won=B9t be far away ?
>>>>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>>>> On 10 Dec 2013, at 17:28, Hiram Chirino =
<hiram@hiramchirino.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>>>>> How we looking for 5.9.1 release?  I'm happy now with how =
the
>>>>>> leveldb
>>>>>>>>>>> bits are looking.  Any outstanding bits left to do?
>>>>>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Hiram Chirino
>>>>>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>>>>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
>>>>>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>>>>> hchirino@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com
>>>>>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>>>>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>>>>>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>>>>> blog: Hiram Chirino's Bit Mojo
>>>>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>>>> Rob Davies
>>>>>>>>>> =8B=8B=8B=8B=8B=8B=8B=8B
>>>>>>>>>> Red Hat, Inc
>>>>>>>>>> http://hawt.io - #dontcha
>>>>>>>>>> Twitter: rajdavies
>>>>>>>>>> Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com
>>>>>>>>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>>>>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>> Rob Davies
>>>>>> =8B=8B=8B=8B=8B=8B=8B=8B
>>>>>> Red Hat, Inc
>>>>>> http://hawt.io - #dontcha
>>>>>> Twitter: rajdavies
>>>>>> Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com
>>>>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>=20
>>>=20
>>=20

Rob Davies
=97=97=97=97=97=97=97=97
Red Hat, Inc
http://hawt.io - #dontcha
Twitter: rajdavies
Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com
ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/


--Apple-Mail=_65C8DC45-4234-4AD2-A6CC-55805326A5E7--