activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gary Tully <gary.tu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Is skinning hawt.io enough to allow it be be packaged in ActiveMQ?
Date Mon, 27 Jan 2014 11:16:33 GMT
Exactly, I don't see any good reason for treating it differently.
I think skinning is enough.

On 22 January 2014 22:44, Hiram Chirino <hiram@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
> Starting up a new thread to avoid hijacking the original POLL thread.
>
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <hzbarcea@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Without the hawt.io community donating the relevant ActiveMQ portions to the
>> ASF we will not be able to get a consensus around proposal #3. Thus, that
>> needs to be taken off the table.
>
> I think that's a faulty assumption that needs to get discussed and addressed.
>
> Any hawtio UI that we package in the ActiveMQ will be reviewed by the
> PMC.  Like any 3rd party library that we ship, it has to have an
> approved license and it's functionality has to be tested and verified
> by the ActiveMQ project.  If we the PMC does not like some detail of
> hawtio we just need to open issues to address them and once it's to
> the PMC's liking we can then package it.  This is no different from
> any other 3rd party lib we use so why are we treating it differently?
>
> --
> Hiram Chirino



-- 
http://redhat.com
http://blog.garytully.com

Mime
View raw message